Abstract

BackgroundTranscription factors that encode ANTP-class homeobox genes play crucial roles in determining the body plan organization and specification of different organs and tissues in bilaterian animals. The three-gene ParaHox family descends from an ancestral gene cluster that existed before the evolution of the Bilateria. All three ParaHox genes are reported from deuterostomes and lophotrochozoans, but not to date from any ecdysozoan taxa, and there is evidence that the ParaHox genes, like the related Hox genes, were ancestrally a single chromosomal cluster. However, unlike the Hox genes, there is as yet no strong evidence that the ParaHox genes are expressed in spatial and temporal order during embryogenesis.ResultsWe isolated fragments of the three Nereis virens ParaHox genes, then used these as probes for whole-mount in situ hybridization in larval and postlarval worms. In Nereis virens the ParaHox genes participate in antero-posterior patterning of ectodermal and endodermal regions of the digestive tract and are expressed in some cells in the segment ganglia. The expression of these genes occurs in larval development in accordance with the position of these cells along the main body axis and in postlarval development in accordance with the position of cells in ganglia along the antero-posterior axis of each segment. In none of these tissues does expression of the three ParaHox genes follow the rule of temporal collinearity.ConclusionIn Nereis virens the ParaHox genes are expressed during antero-posterior patterning of the digestive system (ectodermal foregut and hindgut, and endodermal midgut) of Nereis virens. These genes are also expressed during axial specification of ventral neuroectodermal cell domains, where the expression domains of each gene are re-iterated in each neuromere except for the first parapodial segment. These expression domains are probably predetermined and may be directed on the antero-posterior axis by the Hox genes, whose expression starts much earlier during embryogenesis. Our results support the hypothesis that the ParaHox genes are involved in antero-posterior patterning of the developing embryo, but they do not support the notion that these genes function only in the patterning of endodermal tissues.

Highlights

  • Transcription factors that encode ANTP-class homeobox genes play crucial roles in determining the body plan organization and specification of different organs and tissues in bilaterian animals

  • The Hox and ParaHox genes are believed to descend from a cluster of two to four genes that duplicated before the divergence of the Cnidaria and the Bilateria [5,8,9,10,11,12,13]: both sets of genes are ancestrally clustered on the genome, and individual genes within one cluster are paralogous with genes in the other cluster

  • The ancestral role of the ParaHox genes is less well established; it has been suggested that these genes might have a parallel role in antero-posterior patterning in the endodermal layer of the developing embryo [4,10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transcription factors that encode ANTP-class homeobox genes play crucial roles in determining the body plan organization and specification of different organs and tissues in bilaterian animals. Unlike the Hox genes, there is as yet no strong evidence that the ParaHox genes are expressed in spatial and temporal order during embryogenesis. Transcription factors that encode ANTP-class homeobox genes; NK, Rhox, Irx, and in particular the Hox and ParaHox genes, play crucial roles in determining body plan organization and specification of different organs and tissues of bilaterian animals [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The ParaHox genes are believed to have originated as an organized chromosomal cluster, but the evidence for spatially and temporally collinear expression in these genes is not as strong, partially due to lack of data [8,12,19,20]. The full set of ParaHox genes has not yet been found in any ecdysozoan taxon, including two taxa for which complete genomes are available: the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has no Xlox ortholog [26,27] while the nematode Caenorhabitis elegans has neither Gsh nor Xlox orthologs [28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call