Abstract

BackgroundIn Laos, small backyard poultry systems predominate (90%). The first lethal human cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) occurred in 2007. Few studies have addressed the impact of outbreaks and education campaigns on a smallholder producer system. We evaluated awareness and behaviours related to educational campaigns and the 2007 HPAI outbreaks.MethodsDuring a national 2-stage cross-sectional randomised survey we interviewed 1098 households using a pre-tested questionnaire in five provinces representative of the Southern to Northern strata of Laos. We used multivariate analysis (Stata, version 8; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) to analyse factors affecting recollection of HPAI educational messages, awareness of HPAI, and behaviour change.ResultsOf the 1098 participants, 303 (27.6%) received training on HPAI. The level of awareness was similar to that in 2006. The urban population considered risk to be decreased, yet unsafe behaviours persisted or increased. This contrasted with an increase in awareness and safe behaviour practices in rural areas.Reported behaviour changes in rural areas included higher rates of cessation of poultry consumption and dead poultry burial when compared to 2006. No participants reported poultry deaths to the authorities. Overall, 70% could recall an educational message but the content and accuracy differed widely depending on training exposure. Washing hands and other hygiene advice, messages given during the HPAI educational campaign, were not recalled. Trained persons were able to recall only one message while untrained participants recalled a broader range of messages. Factors associated with an awareness of a threat of AI in Laos were: having received HPAI training, literacy level, access to TV, recent information, living in rural areas.ConclusionWe report a paradoxical relationship between unsafe behaviours and risk perception in urban areas, as well as exposure to HPAI training and message misinterpretation. Future educational campaigns need to be tailored to specific target populations and farming styles, for example, small holder farms as compared to commercial farms. Special attention must be given to varying risk perceptions and the risk of misinterpretation of key messages, economic hardship, and real life consequences of reporting.

Highlights

  • In Laos, small backyard poultry systems predominate (90%)

  • Bird flu knowledge Never heard of bird flu Heard from -TV -Radio -Paper Avian Influenza risk perception -in Laos -at home Think human disease risk is higher than 2006 Able to describe at least one sign of AI in poultry Main reason for higher risk perception n = 383 - Outbreak in Laos - smuggling/importation - lethal disease in human - no disease control - seasonal - outbreak/other countries - human deaths - no animal control * Defined according to Lao Census 2005 in method section. 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval

  • Risk perception decreased and unsafe behaviours persisted or increased. This contrasted with increased risk perception and decreased unsafe behaviour practice in rural areas, the main target of the national highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) educational campaign [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Laos, small backyard poultry systems predominate (90%). Few studies have addressed the impact of outbreaks and education campaigns on a smallholder producer system. We evaluated awareness and behaviours related to educational campaigns and the 2007 HPAI outbreaks. Like Cambodia, small backyard poultry systems predominate (90%) with a mean of 10-20 birds/household [1,2]. In March 2006, in a national survey, we showed a high awareness level of the disease (98%) [6]. Behaviour changed mostly in urban areas and negatively affected consumption, raising, and trade of poultry. After an HPAI poultry outbreak in July 2006, intensive training was performed throughout the country by WHO, FAO, CARE and UNICEF focusing on four high priority preventive behaviours: a) hand washing, b) cooking, c) reporting, and d) separating poultry species [7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.