Abstract
Two groups of epidemiologists were assigned to develop pro and con arguments with regard to a causal explanation for statistical associations sometimes seen between surrogates for occupational and residential electric and magnetic field exposure and brain cancer. The arguments developed were meant to help the Department of Health Services when it prepared its final risk evaluation by a respectful and illuminating review of the possible reasons for concluding either that magnetic fields were or were not likely to be a cause of brain cancer.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have