Abstract
The methodological discussion carried out by Zurli in his book Il limen … provides the opportunity to reconsider two of his case studies (notably Stat. Silv. V 3, 127 and Anth. Lat. 465 Riese), so as to propose different outcomes. Moreover, two other cases from Ausonius’ epigrams (namely 2, 3 and 6, 12 Green) are taken into account, confirming the effectiveness of the falsification principle in the textual criticism, as stated by Zurli.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
