Abstract
This essay has two main goals: first, to give an idea of both the increasing interest in textual criticism that, over the last thirty years, has shaken Hispanic philology, and the plurality of methods that scholars have been trying out in order to edit Spanish classics; second, to offer an example of the genealogical-reconstructive method’s application by summarizing the most relevant outcomes of my previous research on the tradition of one of the most significant texts of the debate over Góngora’s Soledades, i.e. Francisco Fernández de Córdoba’s Examen del Antídoto. Such case study, in fact, displays three of the main issues faced by philologists: the existence of an archetype, contamination, and potentially authorial variants.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.