Abstract

Feeding bioassays were conducted to evaluate relative palatability of three different components of eastern redcedar (ERC) wood to the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes Kollar. Sections of fresh-cut ERC trunk were separated into three component groups: heartwood, sapwood, and ‘transition wood’ (sapwood-heartwood interface). Wooden blocks cut from these groups, as well as pine sapwood (control), were used in ‘choice’ and ‘no-choice’ bioassays. Half of each group was oven-dried while the other half was air-dried. In choice bioassays, pine sustained significantly greater weight loss compared with the air-dried ERC groups. Weight loss for air-dried ERC sapwood was significantly greater compared with both air-dried heartwood and transition wood. In no-choice bioassays, air-dried sapwood and pine sustained the greatest weight losses. Termite worker survival on pine (86.6 ± 2.6%) was significantly greater compared with both oven-dried sapwood (73.2 ± 4.2%) and air-dried sapwood (70.9 ± 3.2%), which were significantly greater than oven-dried transition wood (53.3 ± 4.2) and oven-dried heartwood (38.6 ± 6.5%). Overall, both oven-dried and air-dried heartwood were least palatable to termites.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.