Abstract
AbstractWilkins & Wakefield's identification of anatomical features in the Koobi Fora endocast, which may be thought to carry some functional significance in relation to organization for language, raises fundamental problems of method: attention is drawn to some limitations of the evidence, of endocasts and of the neuroanatomical map used to interpret them.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have