Abstract

BackgroundPatients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome show reduced co-contraction of the teres major during abduction. Consequent insufficient humeral depressor function may contribute to painful irritation of subacromial tissues and offers a potential target for therapy. A crucial gap in knowledge is whether the degree of teres major co-contraction in these patients is influenced by pain itself. To gain insight into this matter, we assessed whether relief of subacromial pain with local analgesics leads to increased adductor co-contraction in 34 patients with subacromial pain. MethodsIn a single-arm interventional study with 34 patients, electromyographic activity of the latissimus dorsi, pectoralis major, teres major and deltoid was assessed during isometric force tasks in 24 directions before and after subacromial Lidocaine injection. Co-contraction was quantified using the activation ratio; range [−1 (sole antagonistic activation, i.e. co-contraction) to 1 (sole agonistic activation)]. FindingsThere were no changes in activation ratio of the teres major after the intervention (Z-score: −0.6, p = 0.569). The activation ratio of the latissimus dorsi increased to 0.38 (quartiles: 0.13–0.76), indicating decreased co-contraction (Z-score: −2.0, p = 0.045). InterpretationSubacromial analgesics led to a decrease in co-contraction of the latissimus dorsi, whereas no change in the degree of teres major co-contraction was observed. This study shows that decreased teres major co-contraction in patients with subacromial pain, likely is not the consequence of pain itself, opening a window for physical therapy with training of teres major co-contraction to reduce subacromial irritation and pain. Level of evidenceLevel II treatment study.

Highlights

  • Compared to age-matched controls, patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS) show reduced co-contraction of the teres major during abduction (Overbeek et al, 2019a)

  • While the rotator cuff muscles are regarded as the major humeral head depressors during abduction, teres major co-contraction may play a role in humeral head depression during this movement (Hik and Ackland, 2019)

  • The median pre-intervention activation ra­ tios of the teres major and latissimus dorsi were 0.48 and 0.26, indicating presence of antagonistic activity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Compared to age-matched controls, patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS) show reduced co-contraction of the teres major during abduction (Overbeek et al, 2019a). Observed reduction of teres major contraction during abduction in patients with SAPS may explain painful irritation of subacromial tissues and represent a target for therapy (Graichen et al, 2005; Halder et al, 2001; Overbeek et al, 2018). The increased cocontraction enhances glenohumeral stability and protection of sub­ acromial tissues by producing a caudally directed force counterbalancing the cranially directed force of the deltoid during abduction (Hik and Ackland, 2019; Overbeek et al, 2019b) These findings suggest that changes in teres major co-contraction relate to biomechanical demands and not to pain.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.