Abstract

Background Paediatric brain tumour resection rates have been shown to correlate with outcome and, it is argued, are linked to operator volume and caseload. The British paediatric neurosurgery community has previously debated centralisation of paediatric neuro-oncology. At the 2018 British Paediatric Neurosurgery Group (BPNG) meeting, a commitment was made to prospectively collect tumour resection data at each Neurosurgical Unit (NSU). Here we review our prospectively-collected 10-year database of the three commonest paediatric posterior fossa tumours – astrocytomas, medulloblastomas and ependymomas. Materials and methods Our primary outcome was extent of resection (EOR) on post-operative MRI scans reviewed by neuro-radiologists. Secondary outcomes comprised neurosurgical morbidity including infection, need for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion and the occurrence of posterior fossa syndrome (PFS). Results 55 children had 62 operations, where our complete resection rates for pilocytic astrocytomas, medulloblastomas and ependymomas were 77%, 79% and 63%, respectively. Both our primary and secondary outcomes were in keeping with the published literature and we discuss here some of the factors which may contribute towards favourable outcomes in a small volume centre. Conclusion Our results suggest that small volume centres can expect equivalent results to larger volume NSUs with regards to paediatric brain tumour surgery. Continuing efforts nationally for data collection on resection rates and operative outcomes is a key step towards optimising management in these children.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.