Abstract

AbstractWe study online secretary problems with returns in combinatorial packing domains with n candidates that arrive sequentially over time in random order. The goal is to determine a feasible packing of candidates of maximum total value. In the first variant, each candidate arrives exactly twice. All 2n arrivals occur in random order. We propose a simple 0.5‐competitive algorithm. For the online bipartite matching problem, we obtain an algorithm with ratio at least 0.5721 − o(1), and an algorithm with ratio at least 0.5459 for all n ≄ 1. We extend all algorithms and ratios to k ≄ 2 arrivals per candidate. In the second variant, there is a pool of undecided candidates. In each round, a random candidate from the pool arrives. Upon arrival a candidate can be either decided (accept/reject) or postponed. We focus on minimizing the expected number of postponements when computing an optimal solution. An expected number of Θ(n log n) is always sufficient. For bipartite matching, we can show a tight bound of O(r log n), where r is the size of the optimum matching. For matroids, we can improve this further to a tight bound of O(râ€Č log(n/râ€Č)), where râ€Č is the minimum rank of the matroid and the dual matroid.

Highlights

  • The secretary problem is a classic approach to study online optimization problems: A sequence of n candidates are arriving in uniform random order

  • We propose a simple approach for general subadditive packing problems with returns, which can be combined with arbitrary offline α-approximation algorithms

  • For the secretary problem with 2 arrivals, we propose a simple 0.5-competitive algorithm that can be combined with arbitrary approximation algorithms in general subadditive packing domains

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The secretary problem is a classic approach to study online optimization problems: A sequence of n candidates are arriving in uniform random order. Each candidate reveals its value upon arrival and must be decided (accept/reject) before seeing any further candidate(s). Every decision is final—once a candidate gets accepted, the process is over. No rejected candidate can be accepted later on. The goal is to accept the best candidate. An optimal solution is to discard the first (roughly) n/e candidates. We accept the first, that is, the best one among the ones seen so far. The probability to hire the best candidate approaches 1/e ≈ 0.37 when n tends to infinity

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.