P966 The intra-patient variability of adalimumab clearance during an intensive sampling study of Crohn’s disease patients receiving maintenance therapy

Abstract

Abstract Background Lower adalimumab (ADA) clearance (CL) is associated with improved outcomes in Crohn’s disease (CD) and may be a superior pharmacokinetic (PK) measure than ADA concentrations. We compared intra-patient variability in ADA CL and concentrations within a 14-day treatment cycle and across two consecutive cycles under maintenance treatment. Methods In a previous PK study of CD patients receiving maintenance ADA 40mg fortnightly, samples were collected intensively at 3 visits (day 4-6, 7-9, and 13-14 post dose) across 2 consecutive cycles. Available sera from this cohort were subsequently used to measure ADA concentrations (lower limit quantification: <1.6 µg/mL) and antibody to adalimumab (ATA) status using a drug tolerant homogeneous mobility shift assay, and albumin. Apparent ADA CL (L/day) was calculated incorporating these measure parameters in a nonlinear mixed effect model with Bayesian priors (under steady state assumption) with dose and inter-dose interval with ATA and albumin as covariate. Rates of sustained clinical and biochemical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) score consistently <5 and CRP levels consistently <3 mg/L) were estimated for each patient. Longitudinal changes in PK parameters within-and-across cycles were evaluated using intra-patient coefficient of variation and linear mixed effect models. Results Sera was available from 70 study visits in 12 patients (6 males, mean age 36 years). Median ADA concentrations and CL were 8 µg/mL (IQR 6.0-10.4) and 0.374 L/day (IQR 0.29-0.43), respectively, with ATA detected in one patient (#9). Estimated ADA concentrations and CL is presented in the Table. Intra-patient variability in CL was much lower across the two 14-day cycle (9% and 7%, respectively) compared to intra-patient variability in ADA concentration (15% and 13%, respectively). Linear mixed effect models confirmed these findings with no impact of sampling time on CL (intercept=0.46±0.12 L/day; slope estimate=0.002±0.002 L/day; p=0.16) as compared to significant change in ADA concentrations (intercept=10.6±1.2 µg/mL; slope estimate=-0.25±0.03 µg/mL; p<0.01) over inter-dose interval sampling time. Sustained clinical and biochemical remission was achieved in 5/12 patients (42%); none presented with CL >0.8 L/day (a cut-off previously associated with worse outcomes). Of 7 patients without sustained clinical and biochemical remission, two presented with optimal concentrations (> 10 µg/mL), thus suggestive of mechanistic failure, and one developed ATA, lower concentration and higher ADA CL. Conclusion CL is subject to less intra-patient variability than ADA concentrations, supporting its assessment at any time point within a 14-day treatment cycle.