Abstract

Abstract Background Endoscopic assessment is the gold standard for monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly utilised as a non-invasive, alternative disease monitoring strategy. Our study aim was to quantify and compare endoscopy usage for evaluation of IBD disease activity before and after the introduction of an IUS service. Methods A retrospective single-centre study was performed. Total numbers of lower GI endoscopies (ileocolonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy) performed for luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) disease evaluation were collected across two 5-year time periods: the pre-IUS era (2010-2014) and the IUS era (2015-2019). Endoscopies for dysplasia surveillance were excluded. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the cumulative number of endoscopies for IBD disease activity evaluation annually relative to the annual number of patients seen in clinic in the pre-IUS and IUS eras. Secondary endpoints included evaluating the number of endoscopies by individual year within each time period, endoscopies according to diagnosis (CD vs. UC), and the number of IUS performed within the IUS era. Categorical variables were compared using a Chi-squared test. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The number of endoscopies performed for IBD disease evaluation decreased from 576 in the pre-IUS era to 474 in the IUS era despite an increase in cumulative annual patient reviews (1985 vs. 3337 patient reviews, respectively). The annual number of endoscopies for disease evaluation per patient in the pre-IUS and IUS eras is illustrated in Figure 1. The proportion of cumulative annual endoscopies relative to patients reviewed across the 5-years reduced from 29 per 100 patients in the pre-IUS era to 14 per 100 patients in the IUS era (OR 2.47, 95% CI 2.15-2.84; p < 0.001). There was a reduction in total endoscopies for CD evaluation from 325 to 264 and UC evaluation from 251 to 210. The proportion of endoscopies performed for CD vs. UC was unchanged between the two eras (56.4% vs. 55.7%; p = 0.81). In the IUS era, a total of 3319 IUS were performed (2673 CD, 646 UC). This included 1467 IUS for assessment of suspected activity (44 per 100 patients/year) and 1852 IUS for objective confirmation of clinical remission (55 per 100 patients/year). Conclusion In the 5 years following introduction of an IUS service, the number of endoscopies performed for evaluation of IBD activity per patient was halved. IUS was performed for both assessment of disease activity and objective confirmation of clinical remission. The potential workflow and cost savings of reduced endoscopies for IBD disease activity evaluation are significant.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call