P558 Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab vs. Infliximab in Biologic-Naïve Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Brazilian Real-World Multicentric Observational Study

Abstract

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) and infliximab (IFX), are considered first-line agents in the treatment of moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC). However, there are no head-to-head studies comparing the relative effectiveness of the two agents, and Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of VDZ and IFX in UC are lacking in the Brazilian population. We aimed to compare effectiveness and safety of VDZ to IFX in Biologic-naïve UC patients. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study, including patients with moderate to severe UC (Total Mayo score 6-12, with an endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3) who treated with VDZ or IFX. The primary endpoints were: clinical remission, defined as a partial Mayo score (PMS) ≤2, endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo subscore of 1 or 0) and steroid-free clinical remission at week 52. Secondary endpoints included; clinical response at weeks 12 and 26, need for drug optimization, adverse events (AEs), need for hospitalization and colectomy, loss of response and biochemical remission (C-reactive protein [CRP] ≤ 0.5 mg/dl and/or fecal calprotectin [FC] ≤ 150 mcg/g) at week 52. Results A total of 174 UC (79 VDZ and 95 IFX) patients were included. Clinical remission and endoscopic remission at week 52 were achieved by 56 (70.8% vs 68.4%, p= 0.44) and 46 (58.2% vs 55.7%, p=0.18) of VDZ and IFX patients, respectively. Steroid-free clinical remission at week 52 was 84.2% and 54.1% in the VDZ and IFX group, respectively (p = 0.03). Clinical response at weeks 12 and 26 was reached in 80.0% vs 76.2%, p = 0.74 and in 71.4% vs 77.3%, p = 0.71 in the VDZ and IFX group, respectively. The need for drug optimization was higher for IFX than for VDZ (36.8% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.03). The incidence of AEs (26.3% vs 12.6%, p=0.03) and need for hospitalization (26.3% vs 11.4%, p=0.02) were higher for IFX than to VDZ patients. Secondary loss of response was similar in the two groups (16.4 % for VDZ and 16.8% for IFX, p = 1.00). Biochemical remission at week 52 was 75.0% for VDZ, and 63.9% for IFX, respectively (p=0,42). Conclusion In this real-world study VDZ and IFX had similar efficacy in inducing clinical remission, endoscopic remission, clinical response and biochemical remission at week 52. Compared to IFX, VDZ was superior in inducing steroid-free remission, in addition to having a better safety profile and less need for dose escalation. Both VDZ and IFX were effective treatment options in bio-naïve UC patients.