P519 Assessment of anal sphincter complex in pregnant patients with non-active perianal Crohns disease

Abstract

Abstract Background Pregnant IBD patients are more likely to undergo Cesarean delivery (CS).. Active perianal Crohn’s disease (PCD) is the only Crohns - related indication for CS. The rationale for CS in this group is that active PCD damages the sphincters and therefore a vaginal delivery may exacerbate the damage to the point of fecal incontinence. Pregnant PCD patients with non-active PCD are commonly not offered CS. We suspect that lack of active PCD does not necessarily attest for the physiological function of the anal complex sphincter and that vaginal delivery may exacerbate their condition to the point of incontinence. Therefore, we conducted a prospective trial to examine, prior to delivery, the anatomy and physiology of the sphincter complex in our cohort and weather pregnant patients with non-active PCD suffer from sphincter damageMethods All consecutive pregnant patients with Non-active PCD were enlisted. Patients underwent physical examination, anal manometry and Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) before conception or during pregnancy before delivery. Active PCD was defined as: Perianal abscess, fistulas with active drainage, severe fissures and stricture. Non active PCD was defined as history of prior PCD, history of surgery for perianal fistula or old scars from previous abscess drainage. Results There were 13 patients who were enlisted to our study. Table 1 describes the TRUS, Manometry and pregnancy details. There were 9 patients (69%) with evidence of sphincter damage in our cohort including external and/or internal sphincter of at least 30 degrees of the muscle radius. Of them, 6 had posterior damage and 4 had anterior damage. In Manometry all patients had either normal or satisfying results. Three patients were strongly recommended to choose CS due to the sphincter damage. Conclusion patients with non-active PCD and future intent to deliver should be assessed routinely regarding their sphincter complex status. This should include TRUS, manometry and clinical evaluation. We discuss with each patient the advantages and disadvantages of vaginal delivery versus CS, weighing the risk of repeated CS (mainly placenta previa and accreta) against the risk of incontinence. Maternal age, Obstetrical history and estimated fetal weight at delivery are the main factors to consider. Although it is still unclear if detected muscle injury affect clinical incontinence, it is our practice to recommend CS for patients with significant muscle damage. We emphasize our recommendation specifically in patients with anterior damage because potentially delivery damage would be to the same area