P462 Efficacy of ustekinumab for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in crohn’s disease. Data from clinical practice from the eneida registry

Abstract

Abstract Background Anti-TNF and thiopurines are the only drugs that demonstrated efficacy in preventing postoperative recurrence (POR) in Crohn’s disease (CD). However, in some cases these drugs are contraindicated or have previously failed. Recently, ustekinumab was licensed for CD but no data on its efficacy in the prevention of POR is still available. Methods All CD patients in whom ustekinumab was prescribed for primary prevention of POR within the first 3 months after ileocecal or ileocolonic resection with anastomosis were identified from the ENEIDA registry (a prospectively maintained database of the Spanish Working Group in IBD –GETECCU-). We evaluated the rates of endoscopic, clinical or surgical POR in the first 18 months. Endoscopic POR was defined by a Rutgeerts score >i1 and advanced endoscopic POR by >i2. Results Thirty patients were included; ustekinumab was started after a median time of 60 days (IIQ 31–90). Concomitant immunosuppressants were used in 17%, 27% received an additional 3-month course of metronidazole after surgery. Regarding risk factors for POR: 23% were active smokers, 62% had prior resections, 33% had penetrating CD behaviour, and 22% had a history of perianal disease. In total, 36% of them had more than one risk factor. 50% had been exposed to ustekinumab prior to the index surgery (46% within the last 6 months). The median time of follow-up on ustekinumab was 17 months (IQR 11–21). Fifty-six per cent of patients had at least one endoscopic assessment within 18 months after surgery: 58% had endoscopic POR and 23% advanced endoscopic POR. Additionally, 13% presented clinical POR at the discretion of the treating physician and none developed surgical POR. Conclusion In a small clinical practice cohort, ustekinumab showed similar efficacy as that reported with anti-TNF in the prevention of endoscopic POR. Unfortunately, the lack of early endoscopic monitoring is still frequent despite the recommendations from guidelines.