P3.02c-036 Management of Early Disease Progression during Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Nivolumab: Topic: IT

Abstract

Immune check-point inhibitors have recently become a cornerstone of the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The peculiar mechanism of action of this drug class implies the possibility to treat patients beyond progressive disease (PD) on the basis of parameters such as the observation of clinical benefit or mild progression at computed tomography scan (CT-scan); however, a guideline for managing early PD during cancer immunotherapy has not been clearly defined yet. The aim of this study is to evaluate the approaches to patients experiencing early PD during treatment with nivolumab for advanced NSCLC. Patients treated with nivolumab (3 mg/Kg every 14 days) for advanced NSCLC between April 2015 and May 2016 within a single-institutional translational research study conducted in the San Martino Hospital – National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy (approved by the local ethical committee) were considered eligible if their first response assessment (after 4 cycles) was PD. The response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and the immune-related response criteria (irRC) were employed. Since IRC imply the confirmation of PD after 2 further cycles, a cut-off of 6 cycles was set to define the patients who continued nivolumab beyond progression. Globally, 31 patients were eligible: median age= 69 years (50-81); males/females= 74%/26%; current or former smokers= 90%; non-squamous/squamous histology= 67%/33%; 25 patients had PD as first evaluation with both criteria, while 4 had PD only with RECIST and 2 had PD only with IRC. With RECIST, 35% of the patients received nivolumab beyond progression (median= 10 cycles) and 80% of such patients were alive at the time of the analysis; on the contrary, only 53% of the patients who discontinued nivolumab at PD were still alive at the time of the analysis. With irRC, 30% of the patients received nivolumab beyond progression (median= 10 cycles) and 75% of such patients were alive at the time of the analysis, compared to only 47% of the patients who discontinued nivolumab at PD. The decision of continuing nivolumab beyond PD was based on the reported clinical benefit (67%), on the observation of a very limited progression at the CT-scan (22%) or on discordance between response criteria (11%). Administering nivolumab beyond progression might influence the outcomes of selected patients. Additional parameters for discriminating which patients are going to benefit from nivolumab continuation need to be investigated.