Abstract
Abstract Background Venous stenosis is a well-recognized complication of transvenous leads when patients require lead revisions or device upgrade. In these cases, balloon venoplasty or alternative venous access with subcutaneous tunneling can be performed. Purpose Compare the outcomes of venoplasty vs. tunneling in patients requiring additional transvenous lead implantation. Methods A single center retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing lead implantation/revision requiring venoplasty or tunneling from 2005–2017. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. Results Ninety five patients met our inclusion criteria (60 venoplasty & 35 tunneling). There was no difference in procedure success rates (p-value=0.98). Tunneling was associated with less fluoroscopy time but higher incidence of acute complications (0% vs. 23%, p-value=0.002) most requiring invasive intervention and/or blood product transfusion. Long term outcomes were comparable and related to lead failure or infection. Outcomes for tunneling vs. venoplasty Variable Tunneling (n=35) Venoplasty (n=60) p-value Age Y 67 (23–84) 70 (29–91) 0.25 Male (%) 24 (69%) 41 (68%) 0.98 Number of existing leads 2.1 (1–4) 2.4 (0–4) 0.1 Age of oldest lead 7.0 (0–21) 7.2 (0–33) 0.73 Number of new leads 1.2 (1–3) 1.4 (1–3) 0.26 Fluoroscopy time (SD) min 29.2 (21.3) 39.7 (21.5) 0.012 Procedure success (%) 35 (100%) 55 (92%) 0.9 Acute complications (%) 8 (23%)1 0 (0%) 0.0002 Pocket hematoma/bleed 4 (11%)2 Hemothorax 2 (6%)3 Pericarditis 1 (3%) Lead compromise 1 (3%) Follow up M 18 (0–76) 28 (0–98) N/A Long term lead issues (%) 6 (17%) 10 (17%) 0.95 Long term complication requiring intervention 4 (11%) 8 (13%) N/A Procedure success: functional lead placed as a result of venoplasty or tunneling. 1Two patients required blood products. 2Two patients required invasive intervention. 3One patient required chest tube and the other ICU admission. Conclusions Balloon venoplasty is associated with similar rates of success and a less incidence of acute complications when compared subcutaneous tunneling. Acknowledgement/Funding NIH T32 Training Grant HL07111-40
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call