P1731High-sensitivity troponin with sex-specific thresholds in suspected acute coronary syndrome

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction Major disparities between women and men in the diagnosis, management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome are well recognised. Whether sex-specific diagnostic thresholds for myocardial infarction will address these differences is uncertain. Purpose To evaluate the impact of implementing a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with sex-specific diagnostic thresholds for myocardial infarction in women and men with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Methods In a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial across ten hospitals we evaluated the implementation of a hs-cTnI assay in 48,282 (47% women) consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. During a validation phase the hs-cTnI assay results were suppressed and a contemporary cTnI assay with a single threshold was used to guide care. Myocardial injury was defined as any hs-cTnI concentration >99th centile of 16 ng/L in women and 34 ng/L in men. The primary outcome was myocardial infarction after the initial presentation or cardiovascular death at 1 year. In this prespecified analysis, we evaluated outcomes in men and women before and after implementation of the hs-cTnI assay. Results Use of the hs-cTnI assay with sex-specific thresholds increased myocardial injury in women by 42% (from 3,521 (16%) to 4,991 (22%)) and by 6% in men (from 5,068 (20%) to 5,369 (21%)). Whilst treatment increased in both sexes, women with myocardial injury remained less likely than men to undergo coronary revascularisation (15% versus34%), or to receive dual anti-platelet (26% versus43%), statin (16% versus26%) or other preventative therapies (P<0.001 for all). The primary outcome occurred in 18% (369/2,072) and 17% (488/2,919) of women with myocardial injury during the validation and implementation phase respectively (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.33), compared to 18% (370/2,044) and 15% (513/3,325) of men (adjusted hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.01). Patient management Conclusion Use of sex-specific thresholds identified five-times more additional women than men with myocardial injury, such that the proportion of women and men with myocardial injury is now similar. Despite this increase, women received approximately half the number of treatments for coronary artery disease as men and their outcomes were not improved. Acknowledgement/Funding The British Heart Foundation