P1218 Non-invasive point-of-care stool sample for detection of Cytomegalovirus infection in patients with Active or Refractory Ulcerative Colitis using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR): a pilot feasibility study

Abstract

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with more flare-ups and deteriorates the prognosis of active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with refractory IBD should be tested for CMV colitis, especially if they are not responding to immunosuppressive therapy. The prevalence of CMV co-infection ranges from 10% to 30% in steroid-refractory acute colitis. Concurrent CMV-colitis is associated with an increased risk of worse therapeutic outcomes, resistance to corticosteroids, and need for salvage therapy. One of the two gold standards of diagnosis of CMV colitis in IBD patients with active disease requires the analysis of tissue biopsies using PCR. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive point-of-care faecal samples using mPCR for detecting CMV in patients with ulcerative colitis compared to standard practice biopsies PCR. Methods We performed a prospective, observational, feasibility study including 62 consecutive patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring intravenous steroids or steroid-refractory UC in the Department of Gastroenterology of University Hospital „Tsaritsa Yoanna – ISUL", from April 2022 to October 2023. In all UC patients, colonic tissue biopsies were performed and analyzed by qualitative CMV PCR. Faecal sample mPCR CMV was performed on the positive patient cohort to compare the feasibility of (ME) Panel IVD using FilmArray mPCR (Biofire, bioMerieux, France). All the tested patients had undergone immunosuppressive therapy and initial stool specimen cultures were obtained to exclude infection with C. difficile and other pathogen flora. Results Out of 62 active UC patients with colonic tissue samples qualitative CMV PCR, n=5 (8%) were positive. Of these n=5 UC patients, n=4 (80%) were positive from the Fecal sample mPCR CMV, resulting in a compatibility of 80% for diagnosing CMV in these patients by the two DNA extraction methods. Calculated Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy was 80% (95% CI) for the mPCR CMV. The patient cohort predominantly comprised males (75%) with a median age of 45 years (range: 30–72 years). Three patients (75%) out of this cohort group were treated with peroral antiviral agent Valganciclovir, one (25%) of them went into clinical and endoscopic remission after the treatment and two patients (50%) received colectomy. The median time performing the Faecal sample mPCR CMV was approx. 1 hour. Conclusion This novel faecal mPCR point-of-care test is a promising, fast and easy non-invasive tool for detection CMV in active or refractory UC patients, comparable with the colonic tissue CMV-DNA PCR.