P0809LEFT VENTRICULAR DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is common cardiac changes in diabetic patients without renal insufficiency. LVDD is also frequently occurs in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Diabetic patients with CKD are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, early detection and prevention of risk factors are critical. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of type 2 diabetes on left ventricular (LV) diastolic function among CKD stage 3 and 5 patients, and whether markers of fluid balance can predict LVDD. Method A total of 409 patients (age and sex matched non-diabetic CKD stage 3 [nDMCKD3], n = 106; diabetic CKD stage 3 [DMCKD3], n = 106; non-diabetic CKD stage 5 [nDMCKD5], n = 73; diabetic CKD stage 5 [DMCKD5], n = 124) were analyzed. The stage 3 CKD patients were retrospectively reviewed, and stage 5 CKD patients were prospectively analyzed. All cohort patients with stage 5 CKD were hospitalized to plan their first dialysis treatment. The following exclusion criteria were applied: ejection fraction less than 45%, history of coronary artery disease and/or intervention treatment, history of angina or myocardial infarction, abnormalities of cardiac rhythm, moderate or severe valvular heart diseases, systemic immunologic diseases, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, infection, and previous renal transplantation. Coronary artery disease having regional wall motion abnormalities on echocardiographic examination was also ruled out. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were compared among groups. Echocardiography, bioimpedance spectroscopy, and serum NT-proBNP were analyzed in patients with stage 5 CKD. The LVDD was defined as E/é ratio greater than 15. Extracellular water/total body water (ECW/TBW) and NT-proBNP were used as markers of fluid balance. Results Patients with E/é ratio > 15 presented with more advanced stages of CKD. Prevalence of LVDD in patients with diabetes was higher compared to those without diabetes. Patients in DMCKD5 group demonstrated higher E/é ratios compared to those with nDMCKD5, DMCKD3, and nDMCKD3 (16.63±5.04 vs. 14.12±4.60 vs. 14.69±4.65 vs. 13.07±3.76, p < 0.001). The E/é ratio in patients with DMCKD5 were significantly higher than those with DMCKD3 (16.63±5.04 vs. 14.69±4.65, p = 0.003). In contrast, the E/é ratio was not significantly different between nDMCKD3 and nDMCKD5 patients (13.07±3.76 vs. 14.12±4.60, p = 0.099). The ECW/TBW in patients with DMCKD5 were significantly higher than nDMCKD5 patients (0.51±0.04 vs. 0.48±0.05, p <0.001). In a multiple regression analysis, the presence of diabetes, serum albumin level, NT-proBNP, and ECW/TBW were significantly associated with LVDD in CKD5 patients. Conclusion Our results suggest that an echocardiographic examination and assessment of volume status should routinely be performed in patients with type 2 DMCKD. Early detection of LVDD before clinical symptoms are apparent is important, regardless of the stage of DMCKD. Fluid overload could be one of the aggravating factors of LVDD in DMCKD patients. Early evaluation of volume status and control of fluid overload should be considered important therapeutic approaches for LVDD in DMCKD patients, especially for those in advanced stages.