Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Aim Level three sleep studies are performed on portable devices which provide information on 3 channels. Some studies have reported that the accuracy of level 3 studies could be as accurate as polysomnography in a sub-set of population in the diagnosis of OSA. However, there is limited information in the literature regarding the effectivity of level 3 study in comparison to level 1 or level 2 study among Indigenous patients. Methods Patients included in this study were adult Indigenous patients identified to have undergone both level 2 and level 3 sleep study. We assessed the accuracy of diagnosing the presence of OSA as per AHI Results There were 12 indigenous patients identified to have undergone both level 2 and level 3 study. Four out of the 12 level 2 sleep studies failed due to sensor dropouts. Excluding patients with failed studies, 4 out of the 8 patients showed a higher AHI on their level 2 sleep study compared to level 3 study. Six patients had the same severity of OSA identified on both Level 2 and Level 3 studies. Conclusion This study shows mixed results in the efficacy of Level 3 studies compared to Level 2 studies, though failure rates may be lower on Level 3 studies. A larger sample size is required to further elaborate on the validity and efficacy of Level 3 studies in the diagnosis of OSA among indigenous Australian population. Grant Support Nil to declare and no funding received for this study

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call