Abstract

The complexes [Rh2(CO)4(μ-p-XC6H4NNNC6H4X′-p)2] (X = X′ = H, Me, Et, OMe, CN, F, Cl or Br; X = H, X′ = OMe or NO2) were prepared in a two-step reaction involving the cleavage of [{Rh(μ-Cl)(CO)2}2] with the diaryltriazene p-XC6H4NNNHC6H4X′-p followed by the deprotonation of the resulting mononuclear triazene complex [RhCl(CO)2{N(C6H4X-p)NNHC6H4X′-p}] with NEt3. Yields of the dimeric products were maximised by carefully controlling the reaction time for each step. Reaction of the tetracarbonyls with PPh3 gave the mono- and di-substituted species [Rh2(CO)4−n(PPh3)n(μ-p-XC6H4NNNC6H4X′-p)2] (n = 1 or 2), the reaction times again depending on the substituents X and X′. Each binuclear complex undergoes at least one reversible one-electron oxidation reaction at a platinum electrode in CH2Cl2. In some cases, e.g. X = X′ = OMe, as many as three oxidation waves are observed; for X = H, X′ = NO2, n = 1 or 2, well-defined reduction waves are apparent. The oxidation potential depends on the extent of carbonyl substitution (for each incremental increase in n the potential is decreased by ca. 300 mV) and on the triazenide ligand substituent such that E°′ for the first oxidation wave can be varied systematically over a range of 800 mV. There is a linear relationship between E°′ for the first oxidation step and the Hammett parameter σp but a poorer correlation for the second oxidation process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.