P-567 Is mosaic embryo transfer a valid alternative for patients lacking euploid embryos? a multicentric study from Argentina

Abstract

Abstract Study question How does low-level mosaicism embryo transfer affect reproductive outcomes, including pregnancy rates and live birth success, compared to transfers involving euploid embryos? Summary answer Most mosaic embryo transfers do not affect reproductive outcomes, as live birth rates appear to be similar to those observed with euploid embryos. What is known already Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is used to identify embryonic genetic abnormalities and, ideally, select euploid embryos for intrauterine transfer, to improve clinical IVF outcomes. Chromosomal mosaicism is defined as the presence of two or more different chromosomal cell lines within an embryo. Numerous sources describe the proportion of mosaic embryos ranging from 4 to 22%. Several publications report that mosaic embryo transfer can lead to successful pregnancies and healthy deliveries, albeit at a lower frequency and with higher rates of pregnancy loss compared to euploid embryos. However, the impact of mosaicism on IVF outcomes remains a matter of controversy. Study design, size, duration Observational and retrospective multi-center study analyzed 6241 embryos from 1218 patients, across 4 IVF centers, who underwent PGT between 2016 and 2023 in a single genetics laboratory. Embryos were categorized as euploid, aneuploid, or mosaic. Patients in group A (n = 894) were transferred an euploid embryo, while in group B (n = 55), a low-grade mosaic embryo, defined as those having less than 40% (2016-2021) or 50% (2021-2023) aneuploid cells, was transferred. Participants/materials, setting, methods The embryos were biopsied and vitrified for later transfer. Blastocyst biopsy DNA was amplified using the SurePlex kit, processed with the VeriSeq kit (Vitrolife), and sequenced on a MiSeq platform. The results were analyzed using BlueFuse-Multi software. Mosaic embryo transfers were conducted only in the absence of a euploid embryo, following genetic counseling. beta-hCG levels >25 IU were considered positive, and clinical pregnancy was confirmed through ultrasound visualization of the gestational sac with heartbeat. Main results and the role of chance Among the analyzed embryos, the proportion of euploid was 46.2% (n = 2883), while mosaic embryos accounted for 19.3% (n = 1207), with 69.5% classified as low-grade and 30.5% as high-grade. Aneuploid embryos comprised 31.3% (n = 1954), and results could not be obtained for 3.2% (n = 197). Fifty-five low-grade mosaic embryos were transferred, including 19 with complete chromosomal mosaicism, 34 with segmental mosaicism, and 2 cases with 2 chromosomes involved in the mosaicism. The positive beta-hCG rate post-transfer was 50.3% for Group A, compared to 49.1% for Group B. Clinical pregnancy rates were 36.9% and 36.4%, respectively. Regarding live births, in Group A 328 (36.7%) children were born, and in Group B, 16 (29.1%), with 2 ongoing pregnancies. Conversely, pregnancy losses in Group B (9.1%) were higher compared to the euploid group (2.9%). Regarding pregnancy losses, in 3 cases no fetal heartbeats were identified, there was one miscarriage <20 weeks, and one twin gestation was lost after a normal non-invasive prenatal testing. In all cases the newborns were apparently healthy after mosaic embryo transfer, with an average gestational week at birth of 39 (37-41), and an average weight of 3197 (2900-4390) grams. Cesarean section was performed for 15/16 births, and one was born by vaginal delivery. Limitations, reasons for caution The study is limited by its retrospective nature and the small number of samples and mosaics transferred. Prenatal and postnatal tests were not conducted. Furthermore, the health of newborns was evaluated only in the initial months of life. Wider implications of the findings Mosaic embryo transfer is a valid alternative for couples lacking euploid embryos. This multicenter study adds evidence that mosaic embryo transfer does not have a clinically relevant impact on pregnancy and live birth rates, similar to what has been reported by other authors. Trial registration number ‘not applicable’