Abstract
In a recent series of papers, James W. Lee reported that mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation violates the second law of thermodynamics and that it is allowed to do so because it is a "Type-B" process that features lateral and longitudinal membrane asymmetry. We show here that these contentions are based on problematic interpretations of the literature. More reliable values of ΔGredox and ΔGATPsynthesis show that the second law is not violated. More recent reports on the structures of the redox-driven proton pumps (Complexes I, III, and IV) suggest that longitudinal membrane asymmetry does not exist. Finally, Lee's predictions for the concentration of protons localized at the P-side surface of the bioenergetic membrane are likely to be much too high due to several errors; thus, his predicted high values of ΔpHsurface that violate the second law are likely to be wrong. There is currently no strong experimental or theoretical evidence to support the contention that oxidative phosphorylation violates the second law of thermodynamics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
