Abstract
The article presents a response by Professors Rousseau and Shperling to criticism by Professors Zardkoohi and Paetzold of their 2003 paper, ‘Pieces of the Action: Ownership and the Changing Employment Relationship.’ Rousseau and Shperling maintain that their work was context-specific, focusing exclusively on knowledge workers and knowledge-intensive firms, whereas Zardkoohi and Paetzold based their criticisms on data drawn from all industries. Consequently, the authors argue, their conclusions remain valid.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
