Abstract

Simple SummaryUltrasound (US) is the preferred imaging modality for thyroid nodule evaluation. Accurate US assessment of thyroid lesions can help decrease unwarranted FNA procedures of benign nodules. Several thyroid nodule risk classification systems that focus on US features have been published. Some of them highlight simple US patterns, while others rely on the presence of multiple US features to categorize thyroid nodules. The current review offers an evaluation of different US system, combining them with the use of fine needle aspiration and the cytological classification systems.The increasing application of ultrasound (US) in recent years has led to a greater number of thyroid nodule diagnoses. Consequently, the number of fine needle aspirations performed to evaluate these lesions has increased. Although the majority of thyroid nodules are benign, identifying methods to define specific lesions and tailor risk of malignancy has become vital. Some of the tools employed to stratify thyroid nodule risk include clinical factors, thyroid US findings, and reporting systems for thyroid cytopathology. Establishing high concordance between US features and cytologic diagnoses might help reduce healthcare costs by diminishing unnecessary thyroid procedures and treatment. This review aims to review radiology US classification systems that influence the practice of thyroid cytology.

Highlights

  • The Bethesda system documented that thyroid nodules with TIRADS > 4 and a diameter lower than 12 mm were highly suspicious for malignancy, with a sensitivity of 91.7%

  • The adoption of an ultrasound (US) system for classifying thyroid nodules is useful for tailoring the diagnostic approach when evaluating these lesions and combining their workup with finer needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy [45,46,47,48]

  • Accurate categorization of thyroid nodules based on an US classification system, irrespective of whether it is the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS or an alternative system, may help physicians in predicting their ROM and rationalize adequate management

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. The incidence rate of thyroid cancer has increased, as has the rate of thyroidectomy [1,2]. The overall mortality for thyroid malignancy during this time period showed no significant changes. The increase in diagnosing thyroid lesions is partly attributed to improvements in imaging technology and increased use of imaging, which leads to higher rates of thyroid nodule detection [3,4,5]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call