Abstract

Abstract. The Stratosphere-troposphere Processes and their Role in Climate (SPARC) Data Initiative (SPARC, 2017) performed the first comprehensive assessment of currently available stratospheric composition measurements obtained from an international suite of space-based limb sounders. The initiative's main objectives were (1) to assess the state of data availability, (2) to compile time series of vertically resolved, zonal monthly mean trace gas and aerosol fields, and (3) to perform a detailed intercomparison of these time series, summarizing useful information and highlighting differences among datasets. The datasets extend over the region from the upper troposphere to the lower mesosphere (300–0.1 hPa) and are provided on a common latitude–pressure grid. They cover 26 different atmospheric constituents including the stratospheric trace gases of primary interest, ozone (O3) and water vapor (H2O), major long-lived trace gases (SF6, N2O, HF, CCl3F, CCl2F2, NOy), trace gases with intermediate lifetimes (HCl, CH4, CO, HNO3), and shorter-lived trace gases important to stratospheric chemistry including nitrogen-containing species (NO, NO2, NOx, N2O5, HNO4), halogens (BrO, ClO, ClONO2, HOCl), and other minor species (OH, HO2, CH2O, CH3CN), and aerosol. This overview of the SPARC Data Initiative introduces the updated versions of the SPARC Data Initiative time series for the extended time period 1979–2018 and provides information on the satellite instruments included in the assessment: LIMS, SAGE I/II/III, HALOE, UARS-MLS, POAM II/III, OSIRIS, SMR, MIPAS, GOMOS, SCIAMACHY, ACE-FTS, ACE-MAESTRO, Aura-MLS, HIRDLS, SMILES, and OMPS-LP. It describes the Data Initiative's top-down climatological validation approach to compare stratospheric composition measurements based on zonal monthly mean fields, which provides upper bounds to relative inter-instrument biases and an assessment of how well the instruments are able to capture geophysical features of the stratosphere. An update to previously published evaluations of O3 and H2O monthly mean time series is provided. In addition, example trace gas evaluations of methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), a set of nitrogen species (NO, NO2, and HNO3), the reactive nitrogen family (NOy), and hydroperoxyl (HO2) are presented. The results highlight the quality, strengths and weaknesses, and representativeness of the different datasets. As a summary, the current state of our knowledge of stratospheric composition and variability is provided based on the overall consistency between the datasets. As such, the SPARC Data Initiative datasets and evaluations can serve as an atlas or reference of stratospheric composition and variability during the “golden age” of atmospheric limb sounding. The updated SPARC Data Initiative zonal monthly mean time series for each instrument are publicly available and accessible via the Zenodo data archive (Hegglin et al., 2020).

Highlights

  • The past four decades starting in the late 1970s represent a “golden age” of stratospheric composition measurements from satellite limb sounders, which capture the spatiotemporal structure of stratospheric composition with a vertical resolution of approximately 1 to 5 km

  • We coin this methodology with the term “climatological validation approach” where “climatological” in this context is not used to refer to a timeaveraged climate state but to year-byyear values

  • The climatological approach was chosen because multiple measurements can in principle be averaged to reduce random measurement errors, leaving the systematic error

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The past four decades starting in the late 1970s represent a “golden age” of stratospheric composition measurements from satellite limb sounders, which capture the spatiotemporal structure of stratospheric composition with a vertical resolution of approximately 1 to 5 km. 3. The SPARC Data Initiative introduced a top-down climatological validation approach to the evaluation of stratospheric composition measurements (Hegglin et al, 2013; Tegtmeier et al, 2013, 2016; SPARC, 2017), based on the comparison of gridded trace gas and aerosol datasets. In addition to this paper, a special issue in the Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) – Atmospheres on the SPARC Data Initiative has presented the evaluations of water vapor (Hegglin et al, 2013), ozone (Tegtmeier et al, 2013), the comparison of ozone from limb sounders with the nadir-viewing Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (Aura-TES) instrument (Neu et al, 2014), an assessment of the impact of instrument-specific sampling patterns on measurement bias (Toohey et al, 2013), and a single instrument study on SMILES observations (Kreyling et al, 2013). The reader is referred to the WCRP SPARC Data Initiative Report (SPARC, 2017) which offers the complete assessment of all the different original atmospheric trace gas observations and aerosol, and is accessible online

Satellite instruments
LIMS on Nimbus 7
HALOE on UARS
MLS on UARS
OSIRIS on Odin
SMR on Odin
GOMOS on Envisat
MIPAS on Envisat
2.10 SCIAMACHY on Envisat
2.11 ACE-FTS on SciSat-1
2.12 ACE-MAESTRO on SciSat-1
2.13 MLS on Aura
2.14 HIRDLS on Aura
2.15 SMILES on the ISS
2.16 OMPS-LP on Suomi-NPP
Gridded dataset construction and evaluation methodology
Gridded dataset construction and uncertainty
Climatological validation approach
Evaluation diagnostics
Multi-instrument mean reference
Summary evaluation
Examples of SPARC Data Initiative trace gas evaluations
References resolution
Carbon monoxide comparisons
Summary evaluations
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call