Outpatient PCI - early discharge PCI, single center experience

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone rapid evolution over the last years and is currently a widely generalized therapeutic option. In the past, it was associated with a significant rate of complications, yet, with the improvement of new generation drug eluting stents, and the radial access (RA) development, PCI has become safer and simpler, with a minimum rate of complications. This allows patient’s faster discharge. Besides the pressure from the limited number of beds in wards, the improvement of PCI has given the confidence to urge outpatient PCI programs. However, there are still centers where there is no ambulatory PCI. Purpose This study aims to describe our center experience of ambulatory PCI program, in terms of safety and efficacy. Methods We analyzed our center’s retrospective cohort of 723 PCI, in 2022. Ambulatory PCI was defined as PCI with same day hospital discharge. Our inclusion criteria were patients submitted to PCI. We excluded patients with acute coronary syndromes and patients needing hospital admission for other non-coronary reasons. Results 467 (65%), of the 723 PCI were performed in ambulatory setting. Patients mean age was 67,8±11 years and 23% (n=107) were female. In 12% (n=55) of the cases, the coronary anatomy was previously known, from a differed procedure. 63% (n=298) had a normal left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), 6% (n=26) had a moderate depression of LVEF and 3% (n=13) had LVEF severe depression. RA was possible in 82% of the cases (n=384), and 18% (n=83) of PCI was done by femoral access (FA). The access size was 6 Fr in 77% (n=359) of the cases, 7Fr in 22% (n=105) and 8Fr in 1% (n=2). The RA hemostasis was by compression (either manually or by external device) and FA hemostasis was first intended by closing device, however in 17% of the transfemoral PCI (n=14) had to be compressed, due to device hemostasis failure. PCI was successful in 97% of the cases (n=449), with revascularization of the goal lesion. The unsuccessful PCI (3% n=18) were because uncrossable lesion in 2% (n=14), and no reflow after PCI in 1% (n=4). 6 patients had to be admitted, after planned outpatient PCI, 5 due to peripheral access complication with hemorrhage of FA (after closing device and manual compression failure) and 1 due to PCI complication, with small coronary perforation. There was a higher probability of admission in patients submitted to transfemoral PCI (p<0,05), and there was no statistically significant relation between unplanned admission and patient’s LVEF. There were no episodes of death, MACE, non-planned hospital readmission and stent failure in the ambulatory PCI population. PCI has become a predictable and reliable technique, capable to treat outpatients. Patients undergoing successful non-complex PCI, without events, can safely be discharged on the same day. Outpatient PCI helps with the functioning of inpatient care, allowing beds to be freed up for other situations.