Outcomes in Patients With Heel Ulcerations that Underwent Below the Knee Amputations Versus Vertical Contour Calcanectomy: Importance of Selection Criteria

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes in patients with heel ulcerations that primarily had a transtibial (below the knee) amputation (N = 38) versus vertical contour calcanectomy (n = 62). The groups had no statistical difference between their Charlson Comorbidity Index Score, a prognostic score of 10-year survival in patients with multiple comorbidities. The odds of primary closure were 21.1 times higher in patients that underwent below knee amputation compared to patients that underwent vertical contour calcanectomy (OR 21.1 [95% CI 3.89-114.21]). The odds of positive soft tissue culture at time of closure were 17.1 times higher for patients that underwent vertical contour calcanectomy (OR 17.1 [95% CI 5.40-54.16]). The odds of a patent posterior tibial artery were 3.3 times higher for patients that underwent vertical contour calcanectomy (OR 3.3 [95% 1.09-10.09]). The secondary aim of the study was to evaluate preoperative factors and postoperative outcomes in patients with failed vertical contour calcanectomy, defined as needing a below knee amputation. The odds of vertical contour calcanectomy failure was 13.7 times higher in male patients (OR 13.7 [95% CI 1.80-107.60]). Vertical contour calcanectomy failure was 5.7 times higher in patients with renal disease (OR 5.7 [95% CI 1.10-30.30]), and vertical contour calcanectomy failure was 16.1 times higher for patients who needed additional surgery post closure (OR 16.1 [95% CI 1.40-183.20]).