Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the potential of using multiple data sources currently available in Denmark for monitoring swine diseases. The study included farms that, based on serology, changed from “negative” to “positive” status for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), enzootic pneumonia (Mycoplasma hyopneumonia), and porcine pleuropneumonia (Actinobacillus pluropneumoniae) between January 2014 and September 2017. These corresponded to 45 swine farms working as individual operation units (i.e., their disease status is independent from other farms) and 81 farms that were part of joint operation units (i.e., 2 or more farms considered to be an epidemiological unit, having swine and personnel are transferred among them, that have the same disease status). Additionally, a total of 95 farms with a negative status for these three diseases during the study period were also included in the study. Changes in mortality data, antimicrobial consumption, and vaccine use at herd level were monitored using Shewhart control charts prior to, during, and after these farms were found positive for the three diseases. The analysis was run separately for the different age groups–weaners (up to 30 kg), sows and finishers herds–within each farm. Briefly, the highest percentage of herds generating alarms was generated up to 3 months before they changed their disease status based on mortality (30%) and 1 month after based on antimicrobial use for respiratory diseases (100%). Porcine pleuropneumonia showed to be the disease with the highest impact on these data at herd level; alarms based on the three data streams were generated in the same month that herds changed their status to porcine pleuropneumonia-positive, as well as the following months. Alarms based on vaccine use generally occurred within the same month or after changes in disease status. False alarms were found in 2% (median value) of the herds for the different age groups based on mortality and antimicrobial use for respiratory diseases in healthy farms. Monitoring changes in mortality data, antimicrobial consumption, and vaccine use showed changes (i.e., warnings) at herd level prior to confirmation from diagnostic tests.
Highlights
Disease monitoring and surveillance involve the ongoing process of collecting and interpreting data to assess the health and disease status of a population [1]
Antimicrobial consumption, and vaccine use at herd level were monitored in Danish breeding herds that became positive for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), enzootic pneumonia (Mycoplasma hyopneumonia) and porcine pleuropneumonia (Actinobacillus pluropneumoniae)
Mortality Data In Denmark, swine mortality data are calculated by the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration based on the Central Husbandry Register (CHR) and the Swine Movement Database (SMD)
Summary
Disease monitoring and surveillance involve the ongoing process of collecting and interpreting data to assess the health and disease status of a population [1]. This is of paramount importance in order to reduce the impact of outbreaks and to avoid trade restrictions. The current Danish databases that include swine-related data cover different aspects of animal health data, including changes in infectious disease status in terms of endemic disease in subpopulations, drug use, and mortality. These data are stored in several public and industry-owned databases
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
