Abstract
Introduction: This comparative analytical study explores the functional outcomes of treating distal tibial fractures using multidirectional locked nailing and plating. Distal tibia fractures, resulting from high-energy trauma, pose challenges due to soft tissue damage, infection risks, and potential unfavorable outcomes. Our study seeks to evaluate and contrast the functional results of treating distal tibial fractures using multidirectional locked nailing versus plating techniques. Materials and Methods: Conducted at Saveetha Medical College and Hospital from August 2022 to October 2023, the study involved 20 cases meeting specific criteria. Adult patients (18-70 years) with closed fractures and grade I compound fractures of distal tibia (AO type 43-A1, 43-A2, and 43-A3) were included. The cases were evenly divided between multidirectional locked nailing and plating groups. Subsequent evaluations, comprising both radiographic and clinical analyses, were performed at 6, 12, and 24-week intervals. Results: The study encompassed various parameters, including age distribution, causes of fractures, weight-bearing protocols, and joint movements. Multidirectional locked nailing demonstrated a shorter fracture union time, promoting earlier weight-bearing and functional exercises. Ankle and knee scores in this group indicated successful joint function restoration but with a higher malunion rate. Plating exhibited a lower malunion rate but a prolonged time to union. Complications, including superficial infections and wound dehiscence, were observed, emphasizing the importance of postoperative monitoring. Despite challenges, the plate group achieved satisfactory functional outcomes, highlighting fair to good ankle scores and full knee movement in all cases. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study underscores the distinctive advantages and considerations of each treatment approach. Multidirectional locked nailing facilitates faster union and joint function restoration but carries a higher malunion risk. Plating, with a lower malunion rate, requires meticulous postoperative care. The choice between the two methods should be individualized, considering patient-specific factors, fracture characteristics, and the surgeon's expertise. This research contributes valuable insights for informed decision-making in distal tibia fracture treatment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.