Abstract

Modernist sculpture is often interpreted through its transparent capacity. In both Clement Greenberg's formalism and the technological and sociological experiments of the avant-garde – especially Lazlo Moholy-Nagy and Vladimir Tatlin – transparency, the capacity to see through a work and view it from multiple perspectives, binds aesthetic taste to ideologies of belonging. And yet the realities of border militarization and forced displacement means these transparent forms are more readily located in the architecture of border fences and camps. Kosovar Flaka Haliti and Burundian Serge Alain Nitegeka create abstract sculptures that directly confront the reality of constrained mobility. Haliti's Speculating on the Blue examines Kosovo's post-conflict agency as constructed by the EU and NATO, where its exclusion extends to refugees entering Europe through the Balkans. And Nitegeka's site-specific installations, informed by his experiences of forced displacement, evoke border fences and improvized shelters common to refugee camps. Rather than the universal schema of Greenbergian transparency, Haliti and Nitegeka evince an “opacity,” theorized by Martiniquais poet/critic Édouard Glissant as a wilful resistance to universal legibility, asserting an irreducible individual agency. Declaring a “right to opacity,” both artists consider how the particular histories of conflict, displacement, and humanitarian intervention relate to other contexts through a recognition of difference. Following Glissant's theory of relation, Haliti and Nitegeka propose new conceptions of commonality where the utopian becomes concrete. Haliti considers the possibility of dissolving partition, as Nitegeka's 100 Stools addresses the need for hospitality and dignity for immigrants in South Africa's xenophobic climate.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call