Abstract

It would be a mistake to assume that cognitive linguists uncovered the secret power of the metaphor. At least two reasons contradict such an idea: firstly, there has always been a great deal of work on metaphor; and, secondly, the concept of metaphor has itself been expanded in cognitive research to encompass questions and fields of study which up until recently had been investigated by scholars who did not consider metaphor to be their principle focus of interest. Indeed, a wide variety of disciplines from grammar to comparative linguistics have now entered into the metaphor debate. In contrast to this loose or all-embracing definition of metaphor adopted in cognitive linguistics, much of the research into metaphor that has been done throughout history, and which has continued to develop parallel to cognitive research, has proceeded by maintaining a restrained definition; for many approaches, metaphor remains a rhetorical trope. Four main approaches can be discerned among the diverse theories which attempt to account for metaphor as a trope: philosophical investigations; linguistic approaches; the poetic tradition; and the rhetorical tradition.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call