Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive primary bone malignancy that has peak incidence in children and young adults <25 years of age. Despite current multimodal treatments, no significant change in patient outcome has been observed in two decades. Presently, there is a lack of established, reliable baseline prognostic markers for aggressive OS, other than extent and site of disease involvement.The canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway controls multiple cellular processes, and is known to be a critical pathway in OS progression. This pathway regulates cellular levels of β-catenin, which is a significant player in the oncogenesis and progression of many cancers.We investigated the relationship between β-catenin, more specifically, the transcriptionally active form of β-catenin, Activated β-Catenin (ABC), and OS progression. Using an in vitro model, we observed that cellular/nuclear ABC levels, but not cellular/nuclear β-catenin levels, increase with the degree of aggressiveness in OS. Our results demonstrate a strong association between nuclear-ABC levels and aggressive OS in vitro. Furthermore, we observed significant correlation between positive nuclear-ABC and patient age and tumor stage.Our results support the potential use of ABC as a predictive marker for risk stratification in OS.

Highlights

  • Osteosarcomas (OS) are aggressive primary bone malignancies that have peak incidence in children and young adults < 25 years of age [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • We investigated the relationship between β-catenin, the transcriptionally active form of β-catenin, Activated β-Catenin (ABC), and OS progression

  • It is crucial to www.Genes&Cancer.com understand the pathobiology of OS progression in order to identify clinically reliable prognostic markers for OS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Osteosarcomas (OS) are aggressive primary bone malignancies that have peak incidence in children and young adults < 25 years of age [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The 5-year eventfree survival (EFS) rate for patients with localized disease is approximately 70% [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. There are no widely recommended screening tests for early diagnosis of OS and no reliable baseline prognostic marker for aggressive OS that have been established. This highlights the need for identifying prognostic markers that would facilitate risk stratification and identify the patient groups in which novel therapeutic interventions are most needed. It is crucial to www.Genes&Cancer.com understand the pathobiology of OS progression in order to identify clinically reliable prognostic markers for OS

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.