Abstract

The primary aim was to compare osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation outcomes between adolescent patients aged 16 years or younger and those older than 16 years. A secondary aim was to analyze the association between physeal closure status and outcomes. Consecutive patients aged 18 years or younger who underwent OCA transplantation with a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified from a prospectively collected database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those aged 16 years or younger (group 1) and those aged 17 to 18 years (group 2). Outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications, reoperations, and cartilage revision surgery. Outcomes were compared between groups, and physeal status was analyzed as a prognostic indicator. A total of 36 patients met the inclusion criteria: 18 in group 1 and 18 in group 2. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics, prior surgical procedures, and surgical details, including concomitant procedures. The mean overall follow-up period was 4.6 ± 2.5 years (range, 2-10.3 years), with no significant difference between the groups (P= .21). There were 10 reoperations (28.8%), 4 in group 1 and 6 in group 2 (P= .47). The overall time to reoperation was 2.8 years and did not significantly differ between groups (P= .75). The failure rate was 5.6%, with 1 patient in each group undergoing either graft debridement or revision OCA transplantation. All PROs were significantly improved postoperatively (P < .05), except for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index stiffness score (P= .28) and the Short Form 12 mental score (P= .19). There were no significant between-group differences in terms of PROs. Patients with closed physes had a significantly greater increase in most PROs compared with patients with open physes (P < .05). OCA transplantation in adolescents results in significant PRO score improvement and a low failure rate, albeit reoperations are not uncommon. Patients with closed physes show greater PRO score improvement than those with open physes. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call