Abstract
A passage by Sextus Placitus Papyriensis (century ?) that deals with the medicinal properties of human urine presents two difficulties : 1) the title Ad elefantiam refers to a therapeutic content, but the passage is made up of two recipes, a medicine one and a goldsmithing one ; 2) the goldsmithing recipe mentions the efficacy of urine to weld gold, but does not explain the procedure, making the text seem incomplete. An internal examination of the chapter demonstrates that Sextus Placitus extracts previous sources, but each extract is reused as a block without the removal of superfluous details in the new passage. Moreover, Sextus Placitus refers to an artificial preparation known as chrysocolla in the goldsmithing recipe, but does not mention its name or its preparation procedure. This information was common knowledge among his contemporaries and could therefore be omitted from the text without causing comprehension problems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
