Abstract
This paper compares Emanuel Swedenborg's account of how bodies ought to be organized with the radical revision of his thought developed by William Blake. As I will suggest, the debate between these figures is not exhausted by the contest between reason and imagination; it is also about “hard” and “soft” systems, which organ-ize bodies, passions, and arguably the imagination itself in ways radically different from each other. These differences are nowhere more evident than in the sexual politics they imply and in the radically different roles they reserve for creation and “emergence.” My argument begins with Swedenborg's Heaven and Hell, the at-first-sight unlikely points of departure for Blake's own thought on organization, and it concludes with a discussion of the 33rd plate of Blake's Milton, which echoes in order radically to revise the machine at the heart of the Swedenborgian world.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
