Abstract

AbstractScholars and practitioners across fields increasingly recognize that business models for the circular economy may be an effective lever for solving ecological persistent problems such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and growing natural resource scarcity. Despite a growing interest in the potential of circular business models, interconnections between the organizational dimensions of firms and their business model innovation processes remain underexplored. Based on problem‐centered expert interviews with business consultants experienced in circular business development, this study creates a conceptual model that offers structured knowledge about why firms steadily reproduce linear BMs and how incumbents manifest themselves as a constant linear‐oriented value creation system. The model also demonstrates organizational conditions and management strategies that frustrate the reproduction of linear BMs and, thus, enable initial moves towards CBM innovation. Building on this, the article provides a set of propositions on how an organizational transition management may be configured and what incumbents require to successfully navigate circular business model innovation. The findings provide a foundation for a contemporary understanding of circular business model transition management, which simultaneously serve as impulses for future research investigations.

Highlights

  • Against the current backdrop of persistent ecological problems such as climate change, massive biodiversity loss, and growing resource scarcity (Rotmans & Loorbach, 2009; Schuitmaker, 2012) profound societal change seems a necessary condition to achieve intra- and intergenerational justice and create a sustainable future (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2014; United Nations [UN], 2015)

  • Instead of presenting the results following the chronological order of the coding process, we describe them aggregated in the conceptual model “Frustrate linearity: Venturing transition towards circular business models” (Fig. 1)

  • CBM innovation dynamics tend to exceed organizational capacities of complexity management compared to recurring efficiency efforts or adjustments to operating routines

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Against the current backdrop of persistent ecological problems such as climate change, massive biodiversity loss, and growing resource scarcity (Rotmans & Loorbach, 2009; Schuitmaker, 2012) profound societal change seems a necessary condition to achieve intra- and intergenerational justice and create a sustainable future (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2014; United Nations [UN], 2015). Circular business model innovation Shape markets, industries, and the society Wide (activities, resources, networks, value propositions)

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call