Abstract
The main key to the implementation of Regional Government (Pemda) in the making of local regulations (Perda) is the well-established organizational communication among the management of the management, so that it can equalize perceptions to support and accelerate development programs in the region. With harmonious organizational communication can be avoided slow process, long-winded, so that it is not efficient which results in the direction of regional development to be inconsistent (Sadu Wasistiono, 2010: 42). For this reason, local government managers should have a partnership and equal relationship. This partnership relationship is important in the process of making a Perda.
 This study uses a qualitative approach that is focused on identifying the dominant factors that can facilitate the communication of local government organizations in the process of making Perda. Data collection techniques use purposive methods and domain analysis. Thus, this research is expected to be studied in a normative, sociological manner that is comprehensive and holistic. This study resulted in the finding of 4 (four) dominant factors in organizational communication in the Sidoarjo Regency Government which became a catalyst in the implementation of local democracy, namely facilities, budget support, staff competence, and good relations with mass media. Through classifying the flow of communication based on the domain that has been established, the research team can finally build a communication model of the Sidoarjo Regency Government organization in the process of making the Perda.
 The main key to the implementation of Regional Government (Pemda) in the making of local regulations (Perda) is the well-established organizational communication among the management of the management, so that it can equalize perceptions to support and accelerate development programs in the region. With harmonious organizational communication can be avoided slow process, long-winded, so that it is not efficient which results in the direction of regional development to be inconsistent (Sadu Wasistiono, 2010: 42). For this reason, local government managers should have a partnership and equal relationship. This partnership relationship is important in the process of making a Perda.
 This study uses a qualitative approach that is focused on identifying the dominant factors that can facilitate the communication of local government organizations in the process of making Perda. Data collection techniques use purposive methods and domain analysis. Thus, this research is expected to be studied in a normative, sociological manner that is comprehensive and holistic. This study resulted in the finding of 4 (four) dominant factors in organizational communication in the Sidoarjo Regency Government which became a catalyst in the implementation of local democracy, namely facilities, budget support, staff competence, and good relations with mass media. Through classifying the flow of communication based on the domain that has been established, the research team can finally build a communication model of the Sidoarjo Regency Government organization in the process of making the Perda.
Highlights
The realization of local democracy is evident since the enactment of direct regional elections (Pilkada) and direct legislative elections (Pileg) in 2005
In this study, local democracy is understood as a way of democratizing in the Sidoarjo regency, which is related to the process of making a law, which involves the executive and legislative
One important aspect in the implementation of local democracy in this study focuses more on the management of organizational communication which describes the flow of messages based on the authority and power attached to the two parties involved in the process of making local regulations
Summary
The realization of local democracy is evident since the enactment of direct regional elections (Pilkada) and direct legislative elections (Pileg) in 2005. The current regional government organization refers to the Attachment to Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning the stipulation of Law Number 1 of 2014, in Article 1 paragraph 22 stated that the Regional Government (Pemda) is the organizer of Government affairs by the Regional Government and the Regional People's Legislative Assembly (DPRD ) according to the principle of autonomy and coadministration with the principle of the Republic of Indonesia. With the direct election system, it gives consequences that the DPRD can no longer bring down the Regional Head before his term ends through a political decision, but must first go through a legal process in court (Rozali Abdullah, 2011: 4). This partnership relationship is important in the process of making a local regulation. The Regional Head is an executive institution which in empirical reality is more dominant in public policy making while the DPRD is a legislative institution that is more dominant in its determination process
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
