Organisation of sensitisation of hind limb withdrawal reflexes from acute noxious stimuli in the rabbit.

Abstract

Spatial aspects of central sensitisation were investigated by studying the effects on three hind limb withdrawal reflexes of an acute noxious stimulus (20 % mustard oil) applied to a number of locations around the body in decerebrate and in anaesthetised rabbits. Reflex responses to electrical stimulation of the toes were recorded from the ankle flexor tibialis anterior (TA) and the knee flexor semitendinosus (ST), whereas responses to stimulation of the heel were recorded from the ankle extensor medial gastrocnemius (MG). In non-spinalised, decerebrated, pentobarbitone-sedated preparations, flexor reflexes were facilitated significantly from sites on the plantar surface of the ipsilateral foot but were either inhibited or unaffected by stimulation of sites away from this location. The heel-MG reflex was facilitated from the ipsilateral heel and was inhibited from a number of ipsilateral, contralateral and off-limb sites. In decerebrated, spinalised, pentobarbitone-sedated animals, mustard oil applied to any site on the ipsilateral hind limb enhanced both flexor reflexes, whereas the MG reflex was enhanced only after stimulation at the ipsilateral heel and was inhibited after stimulation of the toe tips or TA muscle. Mustard oil on the contralateral limb had no effect on any reflex. In rabbits anaesthetised with pentobarbitone and prepared with minimal surgical interference, the sensitisation fields for the heel-MG and toes-TA reflexes were very similar to those in non-spinal decerebrates whereas that for toes-ST was more like the pattern observed in spinalised animals. In no preparation was sensitisation or inhibition of reflexes related to the degree of motoneurone activity generated in direct response to the sensitising stimulus. This study provides for the first time a complete description of the sensitisation fields for reflexes to individual muscles. Descending controls had a marked effect on the area from which sensitisation of flexor reflexes could be obtained, as the sensitisation fields for the flexor reflexes evoked from the toes were larger in spinalised compared to decerebrated, non-spinalised animals. The intermediate sizes of sensitisation fields in anaesthetised animals suggests that the area of these fields can be dynamically controlled from the brain. On the other hand, the sensitisation field for the heel-MG reflex varied little between preparations and appears to be a function of spinal neurones.