Abstract
The article sheds light on provisions of Codes of Civil Procedure of 1853 and 1860 concerning ordinary legal remedies. As this matter was codified for the first time, a necessity of amending and supplementing some provisions soon emerged. Those amendments and supplements, along with original provisions were examined in this paper. The author also deals with regulations on jurisdiction of Court of Appeal, Court of Cassation and Supreme court. Types and categories of ordinary legal remedies were scrutinized, as well as strict time limits within one should lodge an appeal and proper grounds for making an appeal. The author also responds to questions under which circumstances are ordinary legal remedies allowed, and what types of decisions a higher court can make after reviewing the correctness and reasonableness of a decision issued by a lower court. Shortly after enactment of the Code of 1853 it appeared that judicial procedure is too complicated, expensive and ineffective due to too many legal remedies and legal jurisdictions. That is the reason why the Supreme court as the highest court within the hierarchy of legal jurisdictions and as final court of appeal was abolished in 1860, when new Code of Civil Procedure had been passed. New codification envisaged Court of Appeal as second instance court and, at the same time, court of last resort. Regarding legal remedies, Code of 1860 introduced appeal as sole ordinary legal remedy.
Highlights
Када би, међутим, жалба била поднета против неког процесног решења или наредбе донетог у току поступка, првостепени суд не би могао да настави са доказним поступком нити да изрекне пресуду све док касациона власт не реши по жалби и решење не постане извршно.[24]
Пресуда ће се поништити и уколико је суд битно повредио одредбе пар ничног поступка у том смислу што није на захтев странке изузео од суђења судију који је мор ао бити изузет, као и ако је прекорачио тужбени захтев у квалитативном или квантитативном смислу, или није решио о неком од зах тев а парничара
Summary
Д првог парничног процесног законика.[4] Апелата није дозвољена против првостепене пресуде уколико вредност предмета спора не прелази 500 гроша чаршијских, као ни против пресуда донетих на основу признања, одрицања или због изостанка. Правно заин тересована страна не може уложити незадовољство Врховном суду против пресуде Апелационог суда ако вредност предмета спора не прелази 1000 гроша чаршијских и уколико је другостепена одлука сагласна са првосте пеном
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
