Abstract
One approach to analyzing the structure of an ordered set has been to characterize its structure in terms of that of related objects, and vice versa. For example results in [2] characterize in terms of the ordered set P when the lattice Z(P) of lower sets (also called initial segments) of P and the ordered set Id(P) of order ideals (or simply ideals) of P have infinite antichains. The results in [2] are that Z(P) has an infinite antichain if and only if P has an infinite antichain or P has a copy of one of three specific ordered sets; likewise, it is shown that Id(P) has an infinite antichain if and only if P has one or P has a copy of a certain ordered set. In this paper we ‘dismantle’ these results by characterizing separately when P has an infinite antichain or a copy of each of the ordered sets which gives an infinite antichain in Z(P) or Id(P). We begin by describing the ordered sets which play a role in these results. We use w to denote the natural numbers in their usual order, 1 G 2 c 3, . . . , and md denotes the natural numbers in the opposite order, 12 223, . . . . By o @ md, we mean the disjoint union of w and md, where each is given the order indicated, and there is no comparison between elements of w and those of gd. Thus, an ordered set contains a copy of o @ md if and only if it has an infinite ascending chain and an infinite descending chain such that any pair of elements, one from each chain, is incomparable. Let K = {(i, j) E N X N 1 i < j}, and define an order on K by (i, j) s (r, s) if and only if i = r and j c s, or j < r. The Hasse diagram of K is given in Fig. 1, along with that of Kd, the set K with the opposite order.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have