Abstract

In addition to the “traditional” proteins characterized by the unique crystal-like structures needed for unique functions, it is increasingly recognized that many proteins or protein regions (collectively known as intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs)), being biologically active, do not have a specific 3D-structure in their unbound states under physiological conditions. There are also subtler categories of disorder, such as conditional (or dormant) disorder and partial disorder. Both the ability of a protein/region to fold into a well-ordered functional unit or to stay intrinsically disordered but functional are encoded in the amino acid sequence. Structurally, IDPs/IDPRs are characterized by high spatiotemporal heterogeneity and exist as dynamic structural ensembles. It is important to remember, however, that although structure and disorder are often treated as binary states, they actually sit on a structural continuum.

Highlights

  • Other small disordered segments called Molecular Recognition Features (MoRFs) [26], which undergo a contextual transition between disorder and order upon binding, have a function that is defined by the presence of disorder and the transition to an ordered state, and not by a defined three-dimensional structure

  • True negatives (TN) and false positives (FP)/false negatives (FN) is the objective, and this is typically expressed by the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC)

  • This allows the enzyme to translocate the catalytic domain across the narrow type 1 secretion involved in disease pathogenic protective capacities willgradient emergeonwith channel, and thenprocesses transition in to aboth globular structureand when exposed to the calcium the the increased acceptance of the functional roles that intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) in enzymes may play

Read more

Summary

The Dominant Paradigms in Protein Science

The dominant paradigms in protein science were, in many ways, shaped by the earliest experiments in the field. Protein behavior, where well-behaved well-behaved was synonymous with well-structured, with one singular function, and one mechanism of action In many ways, these these early early experiments experiments represented canonical examples of how proteins should be, which all further experiments were held against. Results that ran counter to this assumption were typically considered a problem with the experiment experimenter, and not aa result result of of the the intrinsic intrinsic properties properties of of the the protein As these these anomalies anomalies or the experimenter, accumulated to the point where they could no longer be ignored, these problem proteins and problem regions were often seen as functionally irrelevant, and and in in many many cases, cases, removed removed before before experimentation

Defining
The Subtler Side of Disorder
The fraction of PubMed IDs using IDP
The Thinprotein
The Mechanisms of Disorder
Entropy
Entropic
Accessibility
Plasticity
Signaling
Regulation
Disorder and Protein Evolution
The Tools of the Un-Structural Biologist
Nuclear
Combining Experimental Techniques
Bioinformatics Analysis
Sequence Characteristics
Disorder Prediction
Classification of Functions
Proteome Level Studies
Protein Intrinsic Disorder and Disease
Design and Discovery
10. Protein Intrinsic Disorder and Drug Design and Discovery
12. Conclusions
Findings
Methods

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.