Abstract

In this study, we analyze the role of different structural variants of proteins in the speciation processes. We separate human and mouse proteomes (taken as a reference) into three previously defined variants of disorder: ordered proteins (ORDPs), structured proteins with intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs), and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Then, using the representation we call here Forsdyke plot, we study the correlation of DNA divergence with the corresponding protein (phenotypic) divergence in the three variants, comparing human and mouse coding sequences with their homologs from 26 eukaryotes. The parameters of the correlation are related to the speciation process. We find that the three variants of disordered proteins are differently related to the speciation process. Specifically, IDPs phenotypically diverge earlier than ORDPs and IDPRs. ORDPs diverge later but are phenotypically more reactive to nucleotide mutations than IDPRs and IDPs. Finally, IDPRs appear to diverge phenotypically later than IDPs, like ORDPs, but they are prone to accept mutations with rates that are similar to those of IDPs. We conclude that IDPs are involved in the early stages of the speciation process, whereas mutations in ORDPs, once speciation is initiated, accelerate phenotypic divergence.

Highlights

  • In this study, we analyze the role of different structural variants of proteins in the speciation processes

  • We have observed that ordered proteins (ORDPs) and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are more subject to natural selection than intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs), whereas IDPRs are more subject to mutational bias[12]

  • ORDPs, IDPRs, and IDPs are characterized by different rates of evolution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We analyze the role of different structural variants of proteins in the speciation processes. Comprehensive analyses suggest that proteins with long intrinsically disordered regions sharing loose packing, low degree of tertiary interactions, and weak compactness are prone to have high evolvability (i.e., the ability to adopt new functions within the same fold or changing the fold)[5,6]. This should be related to the unusual properties of IDPs/IDPRs. Firstly, mutations in disordered regions cause smaller stability changes than those in ordered regions[7]. IDPRs appear to diverge phenotypically later than IDPs, like ORDPs, but they have mutational rates that are similar to those of IDPs

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call