Oral Clonidine versus Ivabradine for Attenuating Stress Response in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomised Placebo-controlled Study

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Introduction: Peri-anaesthetic haemodynamic alterations, such as hypertension and tachycardia, can cause increased bleeding during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS), impairing the visibility of the surgical field and resulting in scarring, adhesions, and prolonged surgery time. Various strategies involving pharmacological techniques have been used to mitigate these unfavourable reflexes. Alpha-2 agonists, such as Clonidine, are currently being employed to attenuate sympathoadrenal stimulation caused by tracheal intubation and surgery. Ivabradine is a new drug that selectively lowers Heart Rate (HR) by inhibiting cardiac funny current channels. Aim: To compare the effects of premedication with oral Clonidine versus oral Ivabradine on attenuating haemodynamic stress response and improving the quality of the surgical field in FESS. Materials and Methods: The present randomised, placebocontrolled, double-blind study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive care at Rajendra Hospital, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India from April 2021 to December 2022 on 90 American Soceity of Anaesthelogists ( ASA) Physical status I and II adult patients (aged 18-60 years) undergoing FESS. Group A (n=30) received oral Ivabradine 5 mg, Group B (n=30) received oral Clonidine 0.2 mg, and Group C (n=30) received oral placebo tablets 2 hours before surgery. Haemodynamic parameters, including HR and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), quality of the intraoperative surgical field, postoperative sedation score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, time to analgesia request, blood loss, and adverse effects, were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate mean±Standard Deviation (SD) and percentage. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Tukey post-hoc test, Kruskal-wallis H test, and Pearson’s Chi-square were applied as appropriate. Results: The mean ages were 33.87±12.84, 35.03±12.93, and 40.9±14.46 years for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean weights were 60.5±8.91, 57.83±5.66, and 57.9±5.42 kg, and the mean duration of surgery was 88.67±4.29, 88.8±4.29, and 88.03±3.93 minutes for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of gender, ASA score, and type of surgery between the groups. Baseline HR and MAP were comparable among the groups. HR was significantly lower in both Groups A and B compared to Group C at all time intervals (p-value <0.001). Both drugs significantly attenuated tachycardia and hypertension in response to cardiovascular stress induced by laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation, and extubation. However, Group B showed significantly better control of MAP throughout the intraoperative period and at extubation. The average category scale score, estimated blood loss, and postoperative VAS Score were all significantly lower in Group B than in Group A. Postoperative sedation scores were significantly higher in Group B, and the time to first rescue analgesic was longest in Group B (p<0.05). No significant side effects were observed. Conclusion: Both Clonidine and Ivabradine effectively attenuated the haemodynamic stress response. Clonidine provided better control of MAP, resulting in reduced bleeding, improved operative field visibility, and lower postoperative analgesic requirements compared to Ivabradine.