Abstract
The endoscopically assisted supracerebellar transtentorial (eSCTT) approach is advocated for managing pathologies of the medial temporo-occipital region, but quantitative analysis is currently lacking. The aims of this study were to establish a grid coordinate system on the tentorium to model the anatomical relationship between medial temporo-occipital region pathology and the slope of the tentorium, and then to compare the paramedian eSCTT and extreme-lateral eSCTT approaches quantitatively. Bilateral paramedian and extreme-lateral eSCTT approaches were used to dissect three adult cadaveric heads anatomically. A grid coordinate system was established on the tentorium, and the angles of attack and depth of the surgical corridor of each coordinate point were obtained so that the two eSCTT approaches could be compared statistically. The measurements were then analyzed to determine the condition for selecting each eSCTT approach, and its clinical feasibility was assessed in three patients with large tumors in the medial temporo-occipital region. For coordinate points where the X-coordinate on the grid coordinate system was 1 cm outside the apex of the tentorium, the paramedian eSCTT approach had a significantly wider angle of attack and shorter depth of surgical corridor than the extreme-lateral eSCTT approach. In contrast, the extreme-lateral eSCTT approach was better for coordinate points where the Y-coordinate on the grid coordinate system was 1 cm in front of the apex of the tentorium. The long axis of each patient's tumor was projected on to the tentorium and its corresponding coordinate points were used to match the more appropriate eSCTT approach. Preliminary results for three patients treated with the eSCTT approach for large tumors in the medial temporo-occipital region were encouraging. When the eSCTT approach is applied to manage a large tumor of the medial temporo-occipital region, assessment of the long axis of the tumor and knowledge of the selective condition for each eSCTT approach can help in clinical decision-making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.