Abstract

The increase in the pressure bearing capacity is critical for mitigation of lost circulation, and to do so the strength of the plugging zone should be increased via picking an effective evaluation method and choosing the proper particle size distribution (PSD). Therefore, in order to successfully investigate this process, the traditional evaluation device of lost circulation should be improved for dynamic variation of fracture width to find the optimized plugging materials. This means, a new testing apparatus device capable of testing dynamic fracture width should be developed. Additionally, commonly used selection criteria of PSD are incapable of providing us with a continuous PSD curve since they only fulfill discrete PSDs. To overcome these two obstacles, a variety of continuous PSD models based on a new testing device and method are examined. Likewise, the impact of governing parameters and an optimized PSD selection criterion were studied with a specific lost circulation material (calcium carbonate) and concentration in a water-based drilling fluid. The experimental results demonstrate that the normal distribution model provides the best selection result while the sensitive analysis indicate that the factors influencing pressure bearing capacity in a sequential order are: minimum particle size, standard deviation, maximum particle size and average value. Besides, the optimized experiments illustrated that the maximum particle size should be 1.3 times of the maximum fracture width and the minimum particle size should be 0.8 times of the average fracture width. Moreover, the average value should be equal to the optimal particle average size and the standard deviation should be 0.3 times of the particle average size. It was found that the optimized selection method results in the highest plugging efficiency compared to conventional selection criteria. Collectively, the new device and optimal assessing approach would improve the prediction accuracy of pressure bearing capacity to select an appropriate PSD with varying of fracture width in field operations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.