Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and economical effectiveness of differentiated antibacterial therapy of group IV patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Materials and methods. 42 patients, admitted to the hospital with severe CAP without risk factors for P. aeruginosa infection were randomized in three groups in 1:1:1 ratio. All patients received sequential antibacterial therapy with i.v. amoxicillin/clavulanate or ceftriaxone, or ertapenem in combination with azithromycin switched to oral amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime axetil in combination with oral azithromycin or levofloxacin, respectively, after initial improvement in 3–4 days. A comparative effectiveness analysis was performed based on clinical, laboratory and economic data. Results. Treatment outcomes in all subgroups of patients were similar: in 1st subgroup the cure rate was (28,6 ± 12,1) %, improvement – in (49,4 ± 13,2) % of patients; in 2nd and 3rd subgroups the cure/improvement rates were (35,7 ± 12,8) and (42,9± 13,2) %, respectively (р > 0,05). Conclusion. Antibacterial therapy, always empiric and differentiated depending on severity of disease, con­comitant conditions and previous use of antibiotics within 3 months of the onset of the disease, is a milestone of treatmet of CAP patients. A sequential antibiotic therapy with either aminopenicillin (amoxicillin/clavulanate) of 3rd generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone/cefuroxime axetil) in combination with macrolide (azithromycin) or carbapenem (ertapenem, followed by levofloxacin) is recommended in hospitalized clinical group IV CAP patients without risk factors for P. aeruginosa infection. In current group of patients pharmacoeconomic analysis confirmed the expediency of administration a sequential antibiotic therapy with parenteral amoxicillin/clavulanat or ceftriaxone in combination with azithromycin, followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanat or cefuroxime axetil in combination with azithromycin upon stabilization of patient’s condition.

Highlights

  • Ɇɟɝɨɫɩɿɬɚɥɶɧɚ ɩɧɟɜɦɨɧɿɹ — ɝɨɫɬɪɟ ɡɚɯɜɨɪɸɜɚɧɧɹ, ɹɤɟ ɜɢɧɢɤɥɨ ɡɚ ɦɟɠɚɦɢ ɫɬɚɰɿɨɧɚɪɭ ɬɚ ɫɭɩɪɨɜɨɞɠɭɽɬɶɫɹ ɫɢɦɩɬɨɦɚɦɢ ɿɧɮɟɤɰɿʀ ɧɢɠɧɿɯ ɞɢɯɚɥɶɧɢɯ ɲɥɹɯɿɜ ɿ ɪɟɧɬɝɟɧɨɥɨɝɿɱɧɢɦɢ ɨɡɧɚɤɚɦɢ ɧɨɜɢɯ ɜɨɝɧɢɳɟɜɨ-ɿɧɮɿɥɶɬɪɚɬɢɜɧɢɯ ɡɦɿɧ ɭ ɥɟɝɟɧɹɯ ɡɚ ɜɿɞɫɭɬɧɨɫɬɿ ɨɱɟɜɢɞɧɨʀ ɞɿɚɝɧɨɫɬɢɱɧɨʀ ɚɥɶɬɟɪɧɚɬɢɜɢ. ɇɉ ɽ ɲɢɪɨɤɨ ɪɨɡɩɨɜɫɸɞɠɟɧɨɸ ɩɚɬɨɥɨɝɿɽɸ [2, 4, 5]

  • Ɉɫɧɨɜɧɢɦɢ ɡɛɭɞɧɢɤɚɦɢ ɇɉ ɬɹɠɤɨɝɨ ɩɟɪɟɛɿɝɭ ɽ S. pneumoniae, Legionella spp., H. influenzae, S. aureus, Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., M. pneumoniae ɬɚ ɜɿɪɭɫɢ [7, 8, 9]

  • Ⱦɢɧɚɦɿɤɚ ɨɫɧɨɜɧɢɯ ɤɥɿɧɿɱɧɢɯ ɩɪɨɹɜɿɜ ɇɉ ɭ ɩɪɨɰɟɫɿ ɥɿɤɭɜɚɧɧɹ ɯɜɨɪɢɯ ɬɪɶɨɯ ɩɿɞɝɪɭɩ ɛɭɥɚ ɨɞɧɚɤɨɜɨ (ɪ!0,05) ɜɢɪɚɠɟɧɨɸ — ɩɨɡɢɬɢɜɧɿ ɡɦɿɧɢ ɜɢɹɜɢɥɢ ɜ ɛɿɥɶɲɨɫɬɿ ɜɢɩɚɞɤɿɜ ɭɠɟ ɧɚ 3-ɣ ɞɟɧɶ ɜɿɞ ɩɨɱɚɬɤɭ ɚɧɬɢɛɚɤɬɟɪɿɚɥɶɧɨʀ ɬɟɪɚɩɿʀ. ɉɪɨɬɟ ɬɟɦɩɟɪɚɬɭɪɚ ɬɿɥɚ ɡɚɥɢɲɚɥɚɫɶ ɮɟɛɪɢɥɶɧɨɸ ɭ 21,4±11,0% ɩɚɰɿɽɧɬɿɜ 1-ʀ ɩɿɞɝɪɭɩɢ, ɭ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ɇɟɝɨɫɩɿɬɚɥɶɧɚ ɩɧɟɜɦɨɧɿɹ (ɇɉ) — ɝɨɫɬɪɟ ɡɚɯɜɨɪɸɜɚɧɧɹ, ɹɤɟ ɜɢɧɢɤɥɨ ɡɚ ɦɟɠɚɦɢ ɫɬɚɰɿɨɧɚɪɭ ɬɚ ɫɭɩɪɨɜɨɞɠɭɽɬɶɫɹ ɫɢɦɩɬɨɦɚɦɢ ɿɧɮɟɤɰɿʀ ɧɢɠɧɿɯ ɞɢɯɚɥɶɧɢɯ ɲɥɹɯɿɜ ɿ ɪɟɧɬɝɟɧɨɥɨɝɿɱɧɢɦɢ ɨɡɧɚɤɚɦɢ ɧɨɜɢɯ ɜɨɝɧɢɳɟɜɨ-ɿɧɮɿɥɶɬɪɚɬɢɜɧɢɯ ɡɦɿɧ ɭ ɥɟɝɟɧɹɯ ɡɚ ɜɿɞɫɭɬɧɨɫɬɿ ɨɱɟɜɢɞɧɨʀ ɞɿɚɝɧɨɫɬɢɱɧɨʀ ɚɥɶɬɟɪɧɚɬɢɜɢ. ɇɉ ɽ ɲɢɪɨɤɨ ɪɨɡɩɨɜɫɸɞɠɟɧɨɸ ɩɚɬɨɥɨɝɿɽɸ [2, 4, 5]. Ɏɜɨɪɢɦ 1-ʀ ɩɿɞɝɪɭɩɢ (14 ɩɚɰɿɽɧɬɿɜ) ɩɪɢɡɧɚɱɚɥɢ ɜɧɭɬɪɿɲɧɶɨɜɟɧɧɨ ɤɨɦɛɿɧɚɰɿɸ ɚɦɨɤɫɢɰɢɥɿɧɭ/ɤɥɚɜɭɥɚɧɚɬɭ (Ⱥɭɝɦɟɧɬɢɧ, «GSK», ȼɟɥɢɤɚ Ȼɪɢɬɚɧɿɹ) ɭ ɞɨɡɿ 1,2 ɝ 3 ɪɚɡɢ ɧɚ ɞɨɛɭ ɡ ɚɡɢɬɪɨɦɿɰɢɧɨɦ (ɋɭɦɚɦɟɞ, «Ɍɟɜɚ», ȱɡɪɚʀɥɶ) ɭ ɞɨɡɿ 500 ɦɝ 1 ɪɚɡ ɧɚ ɞɨɛɭ ɩɪɨɬɹɝɨɦ 4–6 ɞɿɛ (ɭ ɫɟɪɟɞɧɶɨɦɭ 5,3 ɞɨɛɢ). Ɉɿɫɥɹ ɰɶɨɝɨ ɚɧɬɢɛɚɤɬɟɪɿɚɥɶɧɭ ɬɟɪɚɩɿɸ ɩɪɨɞɨɜɠɢɥɢ ɩɟɪɨɪɚɥɶɧɢɦɢ ɮɨɪɦɚɦɢ ɚɦɨɤɫɢɰɢɥɿɧ/ɤɥɚɜɭɥɚɧɚɬɭ (Ⱥɭɝɦɟɧɬɢɧ, «GSK», ȼɟɥɢɤɚ Ȼɪɢɬɚɧɿɹ) ɭ ɞɨɡɿ 1000 ɦɝ 2 ɪɚɡɢ ɧɚ ɞɨɛɭ ɩɪɨɬɹɝɨɦ 8–10 ɞɿɛ (ɭ ɫɟɪɟɞɧɶɨɦɭ 8,6 ɞɨɛɢ) ɜ ɩɨɽɞɧɚɧɧɿ ɡ ɚɡɢɬɪɨɦɿɰɢɧɨɦ (ɋɭɦɚɦɟɞ, «Ɍɟɜɚ», ȱɡɪɚʀɥɶ) ɭ ɞɨɡɿ 500 ɦɝ 1 ɪɚɡ ɧɚ ɞɨɛɭ ɩɪɨɬɹɝɨɦ 3 ɞɿɛ.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call