Abstract

Due to the increasing demand and importance of natural gas in the global energy mix, its expeditious recovery is crucial, especially from large-scale unconventional geo-resources. Hydraulic stimulation is an established means of productivity increase especially from tight gas reservoirs. The fracture conductivity generally depends on proppant properties, particularly the shape. Therefore, in this research, the effect of using rod-shaped proppants was investigated. Using rod-shaped proppants instead of conventional spherically shaped proppants, can make a significant difference. Due to the cylindrical shape, higher porosity and permeability are generated, resulting in better conductivity fractures. Thus, to analyze the effect of different proppant shapes on post-fracture performance, a production model was implemented in the FLAC3Dplus-TMVOC framework. Later, an in-depth sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the effects of the proppant shape, size, strength, and effective stress on the fracture aperture reduction and conductivity due to proppant deformation and embedment. The application to a generic model revealed that recovery can be increased by about 7% using aspect ratio 1 rod-shaped proppant with the same diameter as the spherical proppant. Then, increasing the rod-shaped proppant size from an aspect ratio of 1–10 can significantly increase the gas recovery by 13% but results in higher proppant deformation. Finally, the application of rod-shaped proppants to fracturing proposals in well x in a tight gas reservoir of Germany showed that the recovery could be significantly improved if spherical proppants are replaced with rod-shaped proppants.

Highlights

  • The exploitation of the geo-resource of conventional oil and gas for more than a century has led to industrial development

  • The application to a generic model revealed that recovery can be increased by about 7% using aspect ratio 1 rod-shaped proppant with the same diameter as the spherical proppant

  • Fracture conductivity depends on permeability, which depends on the porosity of the proppant pack; changing the shape of proppant can make a significant difference

Read more

Summary

38 Page 2 of 19

Keywords Rod-shaped proppants · Spherical proppants · Fracture conductivity · Hydraulic fracturing · Tight gas · Post-fracture performance

Introduction
Rod‐shaped proppants
38 Page 4 of 19
Numerical modeling
Sensitivity analysis
38 Page 8 of 19
Fracture permeability and conductivity
Effect of multilayer proppants on deformation
Strength contrast between proppant and formation
Effect of bottomhole production pressure on the fracture aperture
Long term production performance
Background
Application of rod‐shaped proppant
38 Page 16 of 19
Conclusions
Findings
38 Page 18 of 19

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.