Abstract

Electron beam lithography (EBL) is a maskless lithography technique used in numerous applications for fabrication of ultrahigh-resolution photolithography masks. The main disadvantage of EBL is that it is time-consuming, requiring the pattern to be written in a successive fashion. Various approaches are used to lower the write time. Throughput-oriented EBL instruments used in industrial applications typically apply a very high acceleration voltage (≥50 kV). However, in many research environments, more cost-effective instruments are used. These tools are usually optimized for high-resolution writing and are not very fast. Hence, they are normally not considered very suitable for writing large-scale structures with high pattern densities, even for limited resolution applications. In this paper, the authors show that a carefully considered optimization of the writing parameters in an EBL instrument (Raith e_LiNE) can improve the writing time to more than 40 times faster than commonly used instrument settings. The authors have applied the optimization procedure in the fabrication of high-precision photolithography masks. Chrome photolithography masks, 15 mm in diameter with a write resolution of 200 nm, were routinely produced during overnight exposures (less than 9 h). The write time estimated by the instrument software for most commonly used settings was close to 14 days. A comparison with conventional chrome masks fabricated using a high-resolution (128 000 dpi) photolithography mask printer showed that our pattern definition is significantly better.

Highlights

  • Several maskless lithography methods exist: electron beam lithography (EBL), direct laser writing1,2 and interference lithography3 are among the ones most widely used

  • Electron beam lithography (EBL) is a maskless lithography technique used in numerous applications for fabrication of ultrahigh-resolution photolithography masks

  • We present a series of optimized parameter settings, which decrease the writing time for EBL writing with a Raith e_LiNE instrument, by more than 40 times compared to most commonly used settings for the instrument

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Several maskless lithography methods exist: electron beam lithography (EBL), direct laser writing and interference lithography are among the ones most widely used. It has been reported that for newer resists, such as the negative tone resist SU-8, the sensitivity is as high as 3.6 lC/cm when exposed by a 50 kV electron beam.. It has been reported that for newer resists, such as the negative tone resist SU-8, the sensitivity is as high as 3.6 lC/cm when exposed by a 50 kV electron beam.15 This is almost 100 times more sensitive than PMMA. The aim of the present work is to increase the writing speed of our EBL system as much as possible in order to manufacture large optical elements (photolithography masks) exploiting a so-called “binary radially sinusoidal zone plate” pattern recently developed by our group.. The aim of the present work is to increase the writing speed of our EBL system as much as possible in order to manufacture large optical elements (photolithography masks) exploiting a so-called “binary radially sinusoidal zone plate” pattern recently developed by our group. The aim was to determine parameters, allowing cm2-area writing, within an acceptable time frame (less than 12 h) and with a precision better than what is commercially available with standard printing production techniques (typically 1.5 lm)

WRITE-TIME OPTIMIZATION CRITERIA
Determining the acceleration voltage
Choosing the collimating aperture size
Enabling high current mode
Write-field size
Write mode
Beam speed and step size
CHALLENGES USING THE FAST-WRITE APPROACH
CHROME PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY MASK FABRICATION PROCEDURE
COMPARISON WITH COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE PHOTOMASKS
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.